Metrics & MoreArticle RecommendationsT he range of molecules and materials published in Inorganic Chemistry has increased substantially over the years. In addition to traditional coordination complexes, main-group molecules, and extended solid-state phases, the journal now regularly publishes the synthesis and characterization of metal− organic frameworks (MOFs), atomically precise nanoclusters (APNCs), colloidal nanomaterials, inorganic composites, engineered metalloenzymes, and bioconjugates. This diversification raises an interesting fundamental question: What characterization standards should editors, reviewers, and readers expect for these diverse classes of materials?The Inorganic Chemistry Author Guidelines state that "For all new compounds, evidence adequate to establish both identity and degree of purity (homogeneity) must be provided." The guidelines further add that "Single-crystal X-ray diffraction results are not, in general, acceptable as the only means of characterization of new compounds. Compounds must also be characterized by spectroscopic and analytical methods appropriate for the particular sample or compound. Methods may include elemental analyses to demonstrate bulk composition, NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy, and electronic spectroscopy." Similar guidance is provided in the Organometallics Author Guidelines, which specifically state that "For all new compounds, Organometallics requires a clear statement in the Experimental Section explaining how purity has been established." The guidelines also state that "Single-crystal X-ray diffraction results are not acceptable as the only means of characterization of new compounds." Importantly, for both journals, the methods used to establish the identity and purity of these compounds are not explicitly specified. However, the Author Guidelines do suggest a list of suitable characterization methods, which for sure are biased toward those researchers doing traditional molecular chemistry.Nevertheless, in our opinion, traditional and nontraditional materials alike must meet an equally high standard for evidence of identity and purity. The analytical techniques may necessarily change from case to case, but the standards still must be met. Admittedly, the required standards are sometimes difficult to meet, to the chagrin of many authors. 1−3 However, it is a requirement that adds considerable value to articles published in Inorganic Chemistry. For one, it ensures some measure of reproducibility, which is one of the most important hallmarks of science. In addition, it ensures that the reported data are robust and reliable and can be used to inform the research of other scientists, which American Chemical Society Publications and other publishers are embracing. For example, the ACS has recently developed a Research Data Policy and is rolling out standardized guidelines for reporting data for commonly used