2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-019-00678-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening physicochemical, microbiological and bioactive properties of fruit vinegars produced from various raw materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
19
2
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
19
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the color values (b*) of some samples close to each other (P>0.05), such as in Sample B and C (samples grown in different cities, but belong to same variety-Sari Lop) or in Sample B (Sari Lop) and D (Sari Zeybek) (samples belong to different varieties and grown in different cities) (Figure 1), total phenolic and flavonoid contents of these samples were statistically different from each other (P<0.05). In the previous study, the total phenolic and flavonoid contents of fig vinegar were determined as 935.5 mg GAE/L and 178.45 mg catechin/L, respectively (Sengun et al, 2020), which were higher than the results of the current study. In the literature, wide variety of total flavonoid contents were also reported for different vinegars, such as 14.43-349.05 mg catechin/L for homemade grape vinegars, 10.89-188.43 mg catechin/L for homemade apple vinegars (Ozturk et al, 2015) and 1655-3999 mg Rutin equivalent/L for nine different Shanxi aged vinegars (Xia et al, 2018).…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitiescontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the color values (b*) of some samples close to each other (P>0.05), such as in Sample B and C (samples grown in different cities, but belong to same variety-Sari Lop) or in Sample B (Sari Lop) and D (Sari Zeybek) (samples belong to different varieties and grown in different cities) (Figure 1), total phenolic and flavonoid contents of these samples were statistically different from each other (P<0.05). In the previous study, the total phenolic and flavonoid contents of fig vinegar were determined as 935.5 mg GAE/L and 178.45 mg catechin/L, respectively (Sengun et al, 2020), which were higher than the results of the current study. In the literature, wide variety of total flavonoid contents were also reported for different vinegars, such as 14.43-349.05 mg catechin/L for homemade grape vinegars, 10.89-188.43 mg catechin/L for homemade apple vinegars (Ozturk et al, 2015) and 1655-3999 mg Rutin equivalent/L for nine different Shanxi aged vinegars (Xia et al, 2018).…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitiescontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, bactericidal effect was determined only in sample A for all test microorganisms, except E. coli O157:H7 and P. acidilactici, and also the highest bactericidal effect was observed to B. subtilis with MBC of 3.12% (Table 4). In our previous study, the MIC value of fig vinegar on L. monocytogenes, E. faecalis, B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli O157:H7, S. Typhimurium, E. coli, B. cereus and P. acidilactici was determined in the range of 3.12-6.25%, while the MBC value of the vinegar was 50% for all test cultures (Sengun et al, 2020). In a study carried out by Ozturk et al (2015), B. cereus was determined as the most sensitive strain against traditionally produced fruit vinegars.…”
Section: The Mic and Mbc Valuesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations