2015
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20150156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease: diagnostic validity of the Brazilian versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised

Abstract: Objective The aim of the present study is to examine the accuracy of the Brazilian versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) to screen for mild cognitive impairment (PDMCI) and dementia (PDD) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Method Both scales were administered to a final convenience sample of 79 patients with PD. Patients were evaluated by a neurologist, a psychiatrist and a neuropsychologist using UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr and Schwab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
32
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed that the TMSE cut‐off point to detect PDD is higher, reflecting lower performance, than it is for PD. However, we found that the MoCA cut‐off point to detect PDD was lower than in previous studies . This should be taken into consideration when interpreting these positive screening tests.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…This study showed that the TMSE cut‐off point to detect PDD is higher, reflecting lower performance, than it is for PD. However, we found that the MoCA cut‐off point to detect PDD was lower than in previous studies . This should be taken into consideration when interpreting these positive screening tests.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Defining a single, optimal MoCA cutoff score from the large number of validation studies is further limited by the fact that the majority of studies have been conducted in specific patient populations, such as those with cerebrovascular conditions (e.g., Cumming et al, 2013;Dong et al, 2010Dong et al, , 2012Freitas et al, 2012b;Godefroy et al, 2011;Pendlebury et al, 2012Pendlebury et al, , 2013Webb et al, 2014;Wong, Lam, et al, 2013a) cardiovascular conditions (Hawkins et al, 2014;McLennan et al, 2011), Parkinson's disease (e.g., Chen et al, 2013;Dalrymple-Alford et al, 2010;Gill et al, 2008;Hoops et al, 2009;Kasten et al, 2010;Krishnan et al, 2015;Ozdilek & Kenangil, 2014;Sobreira et al, 2015), HIV (Koski et al, 2011;Milanini et al, 2014;Janssen et al, 2015;Joska et al, 2016;Overton et al, 2013), Traumatic Brain Injury (Wong, Ngai, et al, 2013b), psychiatric conditions (Gierus et al, 2015;Musso et al, 2014), Huntington disease (Bezdicek et al, 2013), and Korsokoff syndrome (Oudman et al, 2014;Wester et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mini-Mental State Examination may be insufficient to detect cognitive dysfunction in PD patients with OSA and could explain why we did not find differences between the cognition of OSA and non-OSA patients. It might have been better to have used Addenbrooke' s Cognitive Examination or Montreal Cognitive Assessment scales to evaluate cognition 34 . With regard to excessive sleepiness, Merino-Andreu et al documented the inadequate perception of the wake-sleep transition in PD patients, and this could be a possible explanation for the absence of a difference in this variable, when measured by a subjective scale, such as the Epworth Sleepiness Scale 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%