2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for bipolar spectrum disorders: A comprehensive meta-analysis of accuracy studies

Abstract: Although accuracy properties of the three screening instruments did not consistently differ in mental health care services, the HCL-32 was more accurate than the MDQ for the detection of type II BD. More studies in other settings (for example, in primary care) are necessary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It also asks about the duration of such episodes and their impact on family, social and work life. The HCL-32 has been used as both a continuous and categorical measure of hypomanic symptoms (Court et al 2014;Carvalho et al 2015). Although initially developed as a screening instrument for use in people diagnosed with depressive disorders, it is also a sensitive screening tool in non-clinical settings (Meyer et al 2007).…”
Section: Assessment Of Hypomanic Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also asks about the duration of such episodes and their impact on family, social and work life. The HCL-32 has been used as both a continuous and categorical measure of hypomanic symptoms (Court et al 2014;Carvalho et al 2015). Although initially developed as a screening instrument for use in people diagnosed with depressive disorders, it is also a sensitive screening tool in non-clinical settings (Meyer et al 2007).…”
Section: Assessment Of Hypomanic Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have not yet been sensitivity and specificity tests of the HCL-32 as a categorical measure which includes duration and impact on functioning. However, it is likely that by including questions on these features we have improved sensitivity for a diagnosis of hypomania compared with methods which have previously relied solely on a recommended (arbitrary) cut-off of endorsing 14 from the 32 mood questions (Carvalho et al 2015). It is also unlikely that false positives would occur differentially for different tertiles of IL-6 or CRP, or by asthma/eczema diagnosis.…”
Section: Potential Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the MDQ, a US survey found a (lifetime) prevalence of positivity at screening of slightly under 4% (Hirschfeld et al, 2003); in Australia the prevalence was 2.5% (Fisher et al 2007); in Italy 3% (Carta et al, 2012) and in France 3.6% (Carta et al 2013). The HCL-32, which is more complex but more accurate in identifying Bipolar 2 Disorders (Carta et al 2006;Carvalho et al 2014), has been widely used in clinical studies on undiagnosed bipolar disorders (Richardson & Garavan H 2009;Angst et al 2011;Mosolov et al 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos resultados evidencian que la identificación e intervención temprana de los síntomas y experiencias (hipo)maníacos en la población general o en grupos de alto riesgo, así como en contextos asistenciales y clínicos, sería una tarea relevante 8,17 . Ayudar a los profesionales de la salud en la detección precoz de este conjunto de experiencias, tanto a nivel clínico como a nivel subumbral, es una meta sumamente interesante con claras implicaciones prácticas 3,18 .…”
unclassified