2019
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201809116
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Screen‐Printed Soft Capacitive Sensors for Spatial Mapping of Both Positive and Negative Pressures

Abstract: Soft pressure sensors are one class of the essential devices for robotics and wearable device applications. Despite the tremendous progress, sensors that can reliably detect both positive and negative pressures have not yet been demonstrated. In this paper, a soft capacitive pressure sensor, made using a convenient and low-cost screen-printing process that can reliably detect both positive and negative pressures from −60 to 20 kPa, is reported. The sensor is made with an Ecoflex-0030 dielectric layer, conducti… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
83
27
7
2

Citation Types

2
89
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
104
6
2
1

Relationship

7
106

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 113 publications

(91 citation statements)
references

References 41 publications

2
89
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results again indicate that better sensitivity can be achieved by using thinner and softer PDMS substrate, which is in good agreement with the simulation results above in Figure c. Furthermore, the sensitivity of 0.48 kPa −1 is higher than widely reported capacitive pressure sensors, whose sensitivity typically range from as low as ≈0.002 to 0.15 kPa −1 with texturized dielectric layer prepared using sophisticated microfabrication process . The sensitivity is also comparable with many previously reported resistive pressure sensors based on various types of sensing materials (Table S1, Supporting Information).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…The experimental results again indicate that better sensitivity can be achieved by using thinner and softer PDMS substrate, which is in good agreement with the simulation results above in Figure c. Furthermore, the sensitivity of 0.48 kPa −1 is higher than widely reported capacitive pressure sensors, whose sensitivity typically range from as low as ≈0.002 to 0.15 kPa −1 with texturized dielectric layer prepared using sophisticated microfabrication process . The sensitivity is also comparable with many previously reported resistive pressure sensors based on various types of sensing materials (Table S1, Supporting Information).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Typically, the sensitivity of capacitive pressure sensors is increased by microstructuring, which increases fabrication complexity and opaqueness . The sensitivity obtained with these thick PDMS + EMIMTFSI (20%) films compares favorably to recent reports, even without microstructuration. Figure f shows the variation of measured capacitance with time and applied pressure. Capacitance remains stable over time and follows the pressure curve, and immediately returns to the original state after pressure removal (Figure f and Movie S2) with no hysteresis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…[ 60,67,68,71,78 ] The sensitivity of the HRPS changes with applied pressure and is found to be 3.13 kPa −1 within 0–1 kPa, 1.65 kPa −1 within 1–5 kPa, 1.16 kPa −1 within 5–10 kPa, 0.68 kPa −1 within 10–30 kPa, and 0.43 kPa −1 within 30–50 kPa when doped with 0.5 wt% CNT. The sensitivity of the HRPS exceeds that of other capacitive pressure sensors reported in the recent decade in the pressure range above 3 kPa (Figure 2e) [ 7,9,13,29–33,50–53,55,56,61,64–70 ] . Notably, this improvement is most impressive in the large pressure regime, with a maximum of 423% within 10–30 kPa.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.