Over the last two decades, many channels, including several of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, have been shown to be highly sensitive to temperature and proposed to serve as thermosensors for physiological functions and behaviours that depend on temperature. However, it is still largely unknown which TRP channels detect skin, brain and other body temperatures that drive physiological (autonomic) and behavioural cold and heat defences in mammals (Romanovsky 2014). Arguably, the only exception is the TRP channel melastatin-8 (M8), which has been shown to sense a decreased skin temperature to drive tail skin vasoconstriction, non-shivering thermogenesis and cold-avoidance (warmth-seeking) behaviour in rodents (Almeida et al. 2012). In the current issue of Acta Physiologica, Vizin et al. (2015) report the results of a study aimed at establishing whether another TRP channel, vanilloid-4 (V4), plays a similarly critical role in heat defences.TRPV4 is known to be activated by warmth (25-34°C) in vitro (Guler et al. 2002, Watanabe et al. 2002, but the earlier in vivo studies of its thermoregulatory role produced contradictory results. On one side, several groups showed that body temperature of TRPV4-knockout (Trpv4 À/À ) mice did not differ from that of wild-type littermates, whether under thermoneutral conditions or during cold or warmth exposure (Liedtke & Friedman 2003, Lee et al. 2005. These negative results seem to suggest that TRPV4 is not essential for thermoregulation. On the other hand, based on the increased withdrawal latencies in a tailimmersion test and on the increased preference for warmth observed in Trpv4 À/À mice, Lee et al. (2005) proposed that TRPV4 plays important roles in the avoidance responses caused by innocuous warmth (a thermoregulatory response) or noxious heat (a response to thermal pain). Yet, in a subsequent work, the same group argued against such a role for TRPV4 in either response (Huang et al. 2011).It should be noted, however, that thermophysiological studies in mice are notoriously tricky to conduct (Rudaya et al. 2005) and that any studies in knockout animals (typically mice) are often difficult to interpret due to the development of compensation for the knocked-out gene. To circumvent both the methodological and interpretational difficulties of studying genetically modified mice, pharmacological antagonists are often used in rat experiments. This is exactly the approach taken by Vizin et al. (2015).The authors showed that the intravenous administration of HC-067047, a potent TRPV4 antagonist (Everaerts et al. 2010), caused a rise in deep body temperature at an ambient temperature of 26°C (which was neutral in the experimental setup used) or 30°C (a low supraneutral temperature). No body temperature rise occurred at a subneutral ambient temperature of 22°C (at which TRPV4 channels in the skin were presumably not activated) or at a higher supraneutral ambient temperature of 32°C (at which multiple additional central and/or peripheral thermosensors can be speculated t...