2019
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20198981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INKA , an integrative data analysis pipeline for phosphoproteomic inference of active kinases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For standard proteomics analysis of the content of the different cell fractions, the samples were processed according to established protocols 82 , and deposited in the PRIDE repository under accession number PXD024426 . Briefly, following SDS-PAGE, sections were cut from the gel, and slices were digested with trypsin prior to LC-MS/MS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For standard proteomics analysis of the content of the different cell fractions, the samples were processed according to established protocols 82 , and deposited in the PRIDE repository under accession number PXD024426 . Briefly, following SDS-PAGE, sections were cut from the gel, and slices were digested with trypsin prior to LC-MS/MS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide counts were aggregated to proteins and normalized to the total count in each sample. Enrichment for a particular fraction was determined using a modified binomial test 82 . Peptide coverage for vimentin in each fraction was retrieved from the raw data and plotted as a count profile which reflects both the propensity to be analyzed (presence and frequency of lysines that are targeted by trypsin and determine inclusion in the analysis) as well as the distribution of the protein fragments of vimentin present in each fraction to determine any differences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further unveil the role of the observed phosphorylation dynamics in these cells, an R pipeline “InKA”, which integrates kinome, activation loop, phosphoSitePlus, and NetworKIN evidences, was applied to infer kinase activity. 23 Based on this substrate-centric kinase activity prediction model, a total of 131 kinases were predicted with a relative activity score ( Table S2B ). We observed that ERK1, ERK2, and CDK1 are the most-activated kinases, which is more obvious over time upon drug withdrawal in control, sgERK1, and sgJUNB, indicating their dominant roles in drug-resistant melanoma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphoproteomic alterations were analyzed and visualized using Integrative Inferred Kinase Activity (InKA) analysis v1.2.2 (https:// inkascore.org/) and PTMsigDB analysis v2.0 (https://github. com/broadinstitute/ssGSEA2.0) (23,24).…”
Section: Nanolc-ms/ms Acquisition and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrative Inferred Kinase Activity (INKA) analysis was applied on the phosphoproteomic data to assess the kinase activity after moDC binding to a2-3sia in presence of LPS. This method integrates four phosphoproteomic analyses of one sample to a scoring system, allowing ranking of the kinase activity and visualization of the kinase-substrate networks (23). Multiple kinases were affected by a2-3sia and LPS stimulation (Figure 4A and Sl.…”
Section: Alterations In the Modc Phosphoproteome After A2-3 Sialic Acid Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%