2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientists and the history of biological weapons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all countries are menaced by it (Budowle et al 2007), both great world powers and less significant countries. The dual use of biological studies and known biological factors as a biological weapon is highly probable (Budowle et al 2007;Davidson et al 2007;Fox 2004;Friedman et al 2008;Kant and Nagar 2006;Sandhu et al 2003;Guillemin 2006). The possibility of using online pharmacies as a "weapons carrier" is a problem which may appear at some time, as many others which could have been foreseen and effectively prevented much earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Almost all countries are menaced by it (Budowle et al 2007), both great world powers and less significant countries. The dual use of biological studies and known biological factors as a biological weapon is highly probable (Budowle et al 2007;Davidson et al 2007;Fox 2004;Friedman et al 2008;Kant and Nagar 2006;Sandhu et al 2003;Guillemin 2006). The possibility of using online pharmacies as a "weapons carrier" is a problem which may appear at some time, as many others which could have been foreseen and effectively prevented much earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…During World War I, Germany used cholera and plague against humans and anthrax and glanders against livestock (Klietman and Ruoff 2001;Lathrop and Mann 2001;Christopher et al 1997;Guillemin 2006). This led to the formulation of the Geneva Protocol (Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare) (Klietman and Ruoff 2001;Christopher et al 1997;Guillemin 2006;Beck 2003). Between the World Wars, many countries e.g.…”
Section: Terrorism and Bioterrorismmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, if the past is prologue to the future, it is notable that scientists have been the instigators of bioweapons programmes. 101 Interviews with former bioweapons scientists also indicate that they often reconcile the obvious contradiction existing between their past bioweapons work and the Hippocratic Oath that many of them took by emphasizing the security dilemmas that their respective countries faced. 102 American and Soviet scientists equally believed that since the enemy was producing biological weapons, it made sense to develop the means to retaliate in kind.…”
Section: Preventing Access To Existing Tacit Skillsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The tactics used in WWI led to the inclusion of biological weapons in the 1925 Geneva Protocol [1,2]. Both Axis and Allied nations conducted bioweapons research leading up to and during WWII and research on biological weapons was conducted by both East and West during the cold war [1,2]. The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention came into force in 1975 with 22 ratifying countries.…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%