2007 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 2007
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2007.370259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Application Performance on Candidate PetaScale Platforms

Abstract: After a decade where HEC (high-end computing) capability was dominated by the rapid pace of improvements to CPU clock frequency, the performance of next-generation supercomputers is increasingly differentiated by varying interconnect designs and levels of integration. Understanding the tradeoffs of these system designs, in the context of high-end numerical simulations, is a key step towards making effective petascale computing a reality. This work represents one of the most comprehensive performance evaluation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing particle-in-cell (PIC) techniques [5,6] have clearly demonstrated excellent scaling on current terascale leadership class supercomputers. For example, the Gyrokinetic Toroidal Code (GTC) [7,8] a mature PIC code has demonstrated excellent scaling on virtually all of the current leadership class facilities worldwide utilizing MPI and OpenMP [9,10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Pfr Special Issue On Itc20 2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing particle-in-cell (PIC) techniques [5,6] have clearly demonstrated excellent scaling on current terascale leadership class supercomputers. For example, the Gyrokinetic Toroidal Code (GTC) [7,8] a mature PIC code has demonstrated excellent scaling on virtually all of the current leadership class facilities worldwide utilizing MPI and OpenMP [9,10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Pfr Special Issue On Itc20 2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been rankings based on fictitious performance numbers or theoretical peak performance numbers, most of these rankings focus on measured performances. Benchmarks used for these rankings vary in complexity greatly from simply synthetic tests such as STREAM [9] to full (scientific) applications as often used in focused performance studies [10,11]. The benchmarks and problem sizes used in these rankings often have to be adapted or replaced to reflect the changing usage of computer systems.…”
Section: Performance Rankingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GTC has been run effectively, with scaling up to 32K cores, on all of the recent high performance computational architectures [4]. The GTC programing model uses FORTRAN 90 and MPI, and uses PETSc for the potential solves in Poisson's equation, which is discretized with linear finite elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%