Science and revolution / by Ernest Untermann.

Untermann, Ernest

doi:10.5962/bhl.title.24535

Cited by 11 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Inschriften niemals lusitanische, vom Lateinischen verschiedene, Flexionsendung auf. 25 In L.4.1 läßt sich nun plausibel machen, daß es sich wenigstens bei den Wörtern APINVS und VENDICVS um vorrömische Personennamen handelt; 26 doch sind sie offenbar in ihrer Flexionsendung -us an die lat. Grammatik angepaßt.…”

Section: Zur Sprache Der Lusitanischen Inschriftenunclassified

Lusitanisch

Wodtko¹

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dieser Beitrag bietet eine Darstellung des gegenwärtigen Kenntnisstandes im Bereich des Lusitanischen und Vorschläge für weitere Forschung. Er behandelt die Überlieferung einschließlich onomastischer Subsysteme, die (historisch-vergleichende) Phonologie, wie sie uns in der Verschriftlichung entgegen tritt, Morphologie und Lexikon. Besondere Beachtung finden die soziolinguistische Situation und die sprachgenetische Einordnung.

show abstract

Section: Zur Sprache Der Lusitanischen Inschriftenunclassified

Lusitanisch

Wodtko¹

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Industrial revolutions are made possible because of ever more systematic knowledge production and inventions, which are the creative applications of knowledge in new productive forms that increase the set of techniques and products commercially available, and turning obsolete existing ones. Untermann [9] and Schumpeter [10] argue that the capitalist systems are in a permanent state of "creative destruction", characterized by the surge of radical innovations which alter industry structure [9,10], collapse old behaviours and emerge new ones, increasing complexity and "creating" revolution.…”

Section: Outline Of Industrial Revolutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Industry 4.0 and industrial revolutions: An assessment based on complexity

Pinheiro¹,

Putnik²,

Castro³

et al. 2019

FME Transactions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The evolution of society can be related to industrial revolutions. Revolutions are disruptive and transformative phenomena that change and interact with several systems. Industrial revolutions depend on changes in scientific, and mostly technological, paradigms and require people's participation. They are not only created with individual political intentions, because they are collective and complex systems. The expression Industry 4.0, created in Germany in 2011, denotes the so-called fourth industrial revolution. The question considered in this paper is whether Industry 4.0, as the fourth industrial revolution, is effectively underway or is it still only a vision of the future? This article analyses, from the point of view of the science of complexity, the transformations and the relations of industrial systems with other selected systems. It was made through fractal analysis using indicators of four countries, namely, United Kingdom, United States of America, Germany and China. Considering the evolution of population growth, Gross Domestic Product per capita, communication technologies and intellectual property, the results of the analysis show that the factor that stands out is the protection of intellectual property. The analysis of the previous indicators showed that it is not possible to claim that the fourth industrial revolution is underway, implying that Industrial 4.0 may stil be a vision of the future. The results obtained can not be considered conclusive and more research is needed.

show abstract

“…Other recommended HACCP prerequisites [21,22] Risk assessments Government recommendations; Consumer eduation, Safety awarenesss information development of these and other HACCP procedures. Table 2 presents examples of information sources, including legislation, guidelines and industry codes, already available for the food manufacturing sector within the UK.…”

Section: Other Prerequisitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Controlling organic chemical hazards in food manufacturing: A hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP) approach

Ropkins

Beck²

2002

Nahrung

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hazard analysis by critical control points (HACCP) is a systematic approach to the identification, assessment and control of hazards. Effective HACCP requires the consideration of all hazards, i.e., chemical, microbiological and physical. However, to-date most 'in-place' HACCP procedures have tended to focus on the control of microbiological and physical food hazards. In general, the chemical component of HACCP procedures is either ignored or limited to applied chemicals, e.g., food additives and pesticides. In this paper we discuss the application of HACCP to a broader range of chemical hazards, using organic chemical contaminants as examples, and the problems that are likely to arise in the food manufacturing sector. Chemical HACCP procedures are likely to result in many of the advantages previously identified for microbiological HACCP procedures: more effective, efficient and economical than conventional end-point-testing methods. However, the high costs of analytical monitoring of chemical contaminants and a limited understanding of formulation and process optimisation as means of controlling chemical contamination of foods are likely to prevent chemical HACCP becoming as effective as microbiological HACCP.

show abstract

Science and revolution / by Ernest Untermann.

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Lusitanisch

Lusitanisch

Industry 4.0 and industrial revolutions: An assessment based on complexity

Controlling organic chemical hazards in food manufacturing: A hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP) approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About