2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2008.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling trains as a blocking parallel-machine job shop scheduling problem

Abstract: In this paper, the train scheduling problem is modelled as a blocking parallel-machine job shop scheduling (BPMJSS) problem. In the model, trains, single-track sections and multiple-track sections, respectively, are synonymous with jobs, single machines and parallel machines, and an operation is regarded as the movement/traversal of a train across a section. Due to the lack of buffer space, the real-life case should consider blocking or hold-while-wait constraints, which means that a track section cannot relea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Newman et al (2010) review applications of operations research in mine planning. Liu and Kozan (2009) focus on the movement of coal in the coal export chain and model the scheduling of coal-carrying trains as a blocking parallel-machine job shop scheduling problem. Many researchers have considered the optimal storage of containers in a yard.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newman et al (2010) review applications of operations research in mine planning. Liu and Kozan (2009) focus on the movement of coal in the coal export chain and model the scheduling of coal-carrying trains as a blocking parallel-machine job shop scheduling problem. Many researchers have considered the optimal storage of containers in a yard.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some literature, the train scheduling problem is modeled as a blocking parallel-machine job shop scheduling problem solved by the alternative graph model in some literature. Liu and Kozan [18] present a feasibility satisfaction procedure algorithm to solve the train scheduling problem which regarded as a blocking parallel-machine job shop scheduling problem. Burdett and Kozan [19] proposed a novel hybrid job shop approach to create new train schedules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorfman and Medanic [16] incorporated some priority rules into a discrete event simulation framework to solve large-scale real-world train scheduling problem. Şahin [17], Higgins et al [14], and Liu and Kozan [18] extended some priority rules to backtracking search, look-ahead search, and metaheuristic algorithms for train scheduling, respectively. Burdett and Kozan [19] divided the scheduling process into two levels: global scheduling to establish an initial train diagram without considering conflicts and local scheduling to repair conflicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], the train scheduling problem is formulated as a blocking parallel-machine job-shop scheduling problem and modeled as an alternative graph. A heuristic algorithm, referred to as "the feasibility satisfaction procedure", is proposed to resolve the conflicts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%