Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2535372.2535387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling packets over multiple interfaces while respecting user preferences

Abstract: Now that our smartphones have multiple interfaces (WiFi, 3G, 4G, etc.), we have preferences for which interfaces an application may use. We may prefer to stream video over WiFi because it is fast, but VoIP over 3G because it gives continued connectivity. We also have relative preferences, such as giving Netflix twice as much capacity as Dropbox. This means our mobile devices need to schedule packets in keeping with our preferences while making use of all the capacity available. This is the natural domain of fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scheduling in the presence of placement constraints. There are some recent works investigating max-min fair allocation/scheduling for one type of resource while respecting placement constraints [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. These single-resource schedulers could be useful in a multi-resource setting when one of the resources is dominantly requested by all users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scheduling in the presence of placement constraints. There are some recent works investigating max-min fair allocation/scheduling for one type of resource while respecting placement constraints [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. These single-resource schedulers could be useful in a multi-resource setting when one of the resources is dominantly requested by all users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Theorem 5: The proof follows exactly the same line of arguments as Theorem 4. Specifically, let λ i , and ν n,i , denote the Lagrange multipliers corresponding to the constraints in (19), and (20). The Lagrangian function for Problem 2 at server i is given by:…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some recent works investigating max-min fair allocation/scheduling for one type of resource while respecting placement constraints [2], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. These schedulers could be useful in a multi-resource setting only when one of the resources serves as the bottleneck for all users, otherwise they might result in poor resource utilization [3], [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that smart mobile devices can operate in heterogenous network environments, use different protocols and can now operate over much wider bandwidths. A natural way to tackle the problem of traffic congestion is to take advantage of multiple network interfaces available on these devices by using these interfaces intelligently to distribute data content among the users [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%