Scanning electron microscopy in the investigation of bite marks in foodstuffs

The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods

“…Furthermore, in contrast to the traditional methods and scanning electron microscopy [20], this method is nondestructive. After the surface scanning of the bite mark, DNA samples can be taken.…”

The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods

“…Furthermore, in contrast to the traditional methods and scanning electron microscopy [20], this method is nondestructive. After the surface scanning of the bite mark, DNA samples can be taken.…”

Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inanimate Objects and the Underlying Proofs for Validity and Judicial Acceptance

“…While Technical Notes were published on an almost regular basis throughout the study period, Case Reports were published only until 2006. Except for a single publication in 1975 , Papers began to appear in 1990 and their publication frequency increased in the later years of the study period. Figure shows the chronological relationship between categories of publications and continents belonging to affiliated countries.…”

The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis

“…One of the fundamental problems with this task is the wide variety of techniques that have been described in the literature [8]. Techniques using confocal [10], reflex and scanning electron microscopes [11][12][13], complex computer systems [14,15], special light sources [16,17], fingerprint dusting powder [18] and overlays have all been reported [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Indeed a new technique involving the 3D laser scanning of dental casts has recently been described by two research groups, adding a further technique to the plethora of possible approaches to bite mark analysis [26,27].…”

The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods

“…Furthermore, in contrast to the traditional methods and scanning electron microscopy [20], this method is nondestructive. After the surface scanning of the bite mark, DNA samples can be taken.…”

Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inanimate Objects and the Underlying Proofs for Validity and Judicial Acceptance

“…While Technical Notes were published on an almost regular basis throughout the study period, Case Reports were published only until 2006. Except for a single publication in 1975 , Papers began to appear in 1990 and their publication frequency increased in the later years of the study period. Figure shows the chronological relationship between categories of publications and continents belonging to affiliated countries.…”

The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis

“…One of the fundamental problems with this task is the wide variety of techniques that have been described in the literature [8]. Techniques using confocal [10], reflex and scanning electron microscopes [11][12][13], complex computer systems [14,15], special light sources [16,17], fingerprint dusting powder [18] and overlays have all been reported [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Indeed a new technique involving the 3D laser scanning of dental casts has recently been described by two research groups, adding a further technique to the plethora of possible approaches to bite mark analysis [26,27].…”

The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods

“…Furthermore, in contrast to the traditional methods and scanning electron microscopy [20], this method is nondestructive. After the surface scanning of the bite mark, DNA samples can be taken.…”

Bite Mark Analysis in Foodstuffs and Inanimate Objects and the Underlying Proofs for Validity and Judicial Acceptance

“…While Technical Notes were published on an almost regular basis throughout the study period, Case Reports were published only until 2006. Except for a single publication in 1975 , Papers began to appear in 1990 and their publication frequency increased in the later years of the study period. Figure shows the chronological relationship between categories of publications and continents belonging to affiliated countries.…”

The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis

“…One of the fundamental problems with this task is the wide variety of techniques that have been described in the literature [8]. Techniques using confocal [10], reflex and scanning electron microscopes [11][12][13], complex computer systems [14,15], special light sources [16,17], fingerprint dusting powder [18] and overlays have all been reported [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Indeed a new technique involving the 3D laser scanning of dental casts has recently been described by two research groups, adding a further technique to the plethora of possible approaches to bite mark analysis [26,27].…”