Scaling of movements with body mass in a small opossum: evidence for an optimal body size in mammals

Abstract

Movement by mammals generally increases with body size, described by a positive exponent scaling with either home range area or day range distances. Below ca. 100 g, however, interspecific comparisons suggest a negative scaling, increasing movement with decreasing body size. Such a pattern is expected from the rising costs of thermoregulation below ca. 100 g, implying that it should also be observed in intraspecific comparisons. We tested this hypothesis by investigating the scaling exponent of daily home range with body mass for a small (< 100 g) marsupial, the gray slender mouse opossum, Marmosops incanus. We tracked 85 opossums (56 M, 29 F) with a spool-and-line device between August 1998 and October 2005 in the Serra dos Órgãos National Park, a region of Atlantic Forest in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Individual paths were mapped and daily home ranges quantified by the minimum convex polygon encompassing each path. We formulated linear models and compared them using Akaike information criteria. The best-supported model for females had only climatic season as a main determinant of daily home range, whereas the best model for males had body mass and reproductive season as the main effects. As predicted, the scaling exponent of daily home range with body mass of males was negative, in contrast with positive intraspecific exponents for opossums > 100 g estimated in a previous study. The inversion in scaling relationships around 100 g in opossums supports the rising costs of thermoregulation as the main cause of this general pattern in mammals. Effects of body mass are generally weak in intraspecific comparisons, but might still be detected after standardizing other effects, opening new possibilities for testing macroecological models at smaller scales. Espera-se que a quantidade de movimento de mamíferos aumente com o tamanho corporal, descrita por um expoente de escala positivo, tanto para área de vida quanto para distâncias diárias de deslocamento. Abaixo de ca. 100 g, comparações interespecíficas sugerem um expoente negativo, áreas de movimento aumentando com menores tamanhos de corpo. Este padrão é apoiado pelo custo crescente de termorregulação abaixo de ca. 100 g, que implica que também ocorreria em comparações intraespecíficas. Testamos esta hipótese investigando o expoente de escala da área de vida diária com a massa corporal em um pequeno (< 100 g) marsupial, Marmosops incanus. Indivíduos foram rastreados com carretel-de-rastreamento entre agosto de 1998 e outubro de 2005, no Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, uma região de Mata Atlântica no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Trajetórias individuais foram mapeadas e sua área de vida diária medida pelo polígono convexo mínimo envolvendo cada trajetória. Oitenta e cinco indivíduos foram rastreados, sendo 29 fêmeas e 56 machos. Modelos lineares foram formulados e comparados com o Critério de Informação de Akaike. O modelo com maior suporte para fêmeas teve apenas estação climática como determinante principal da área de vida diária, enquanto o melhor modelo para machos teve massa corporal e estação reprodutiva como efeitos principais. O expoente de escala de área de vida diária com massa corporal de machos foi negativo, contrastando como os expoentes positivos para marsupiais > 100 g estimados em um estudo anterior. A inversão de relações de escala em torno de 100 g nestes marsupiais apoia que custos crescentes de termorregulação sejam a causa principal deste padrão geral em mamíferos. Os efeitos da massa corporal são geralmente fracos em comparações intraespecíficas, mas podem ser detectados após a exclusão de outros efeitos, abrindo novas possibilidades para testar modelos macroecológicos em escalas menores.

The role of environmental temperature on movement patterns of giant anteaters

“…We believe that sex can be related to individual body mass (sexual size dimorphism, Lindenfors et al 2007), and that both sex and body mass should explain part of variability observed in movement, as found in many mammals' species (e.g. Vieira et al 2019 andLidgard et al 2020).…”

Mammalian research honoring the educational contributions of Grinnell Awardee Robert M. Timm

“…In this Special Feature, many of Bob's Ph.D. students offer contributions illustrating two themes that have consistently run through his research: 1) small mammals, and 2) New World mammals, as well as the breadth of his knowledge and interests (Beasley and Maher 2019;Esselstyn et al 2019;McCain 2019;Soley-Guardia et al 2019;Vieira et al 2019;Woodman and Wilken 2019;York et al 2019). Although Bob's graduate students were and remain fiercely independent in their research (a quality he probably sought out, and certainly encouraged), this collection of manuscripts encapsulates his own interests remarkably well.…”

Habitat specificity drives differences in space‐use patterns of multiple mesocarnivores in an agroecosystem

“…For example, home-range sizes typically scale with body mass (Noonan et al, 2019), as larger species generally require more resources and therefore larger areas to access these resources (Tucker et al, 2014). Homerange size can also be affected by various other factors, such as habitat type and quality (Pop et al, 2018;Vieira et al, 2019), climatic conditions (Fieberg & B€ orger, 2012;Gosselink et al, 2003), sex (Phillips et al, 1998;Vanak & Gompper, 2010), and individual differences (Noonan et al, 2020). Thus, patterns of home-range use represent a cognitive map of spatially and temporally varying resource requirements and constraints as perceived by the animal (Powell & Mitchell, 2012).…”