2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale reading validation for estimating age from tagged fish recapture in a brown trout (Salmo trutta) population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The software Image-J v. 1.4.1 [40] was employed to digitize the position of each growth ring (circulus) and to measure inter-circuli spacing with reference to a calibrated scale bar [41]. Freshwater and marine ages were determined based on the number of annuli [42], and the point of entry of smolts into the sea identified by a change from concave to convex circuli (i.e. the point where circuli open outwards on the posterior zone of the scale) and presence of broken growth rings [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software Image-J v. 1.4.1 [40] was employed to digitize the position of each growth ring (circulus) and to measure inter-circuli spacing with reference to a calibrated scale bar [41]. Freshwater and marine ages were determined based on the number of annuli [42], and the point of entry of smolts into the sea identified by a change from concave to convex circuli (i.e. the point where circuli open outwards on the posterior zone of the scale) and presence of broken growth rings [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freshwater and marine ages were determined based on the number of annuli [36], and the points of entry of smolts into the sea (beginning of marine phase) and end of the first marine growing season (post-smolt growth, PSG) were noted [16]. Twenty three finnocks (individuals which had returned to freshwater before completing one full winter at sea [37]) were excluded from analysis as these provided no comparable data on post-smolt growth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the laboratory, total egg number and average egg size (egg diameter, D) were determined for each female from a random sample of 20 eggs to nearest 0.1 mm with a digital micrometer for three times. Scales were used for estimating age (Rifflart et al 2006). All specimens were preserved in 10% formalin and kept in the Museum of Freshwater Fishes, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IHB, CAS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%