2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalar conservation and boundedness in simulations of compressible flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the SGS model does not provide adequate dissipation for a sufficiently smooth scalar field, dispersive oscillations can produce unphysical scalar excursions [17]. These excursions are commonly mitigated using upwind schemes [18,19], or bound-preserving limiters [20,21], both of which introduce artificial dissipation and can lower the accuracy of numerical solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the SGS model does not provide adequate dissipation for a sufficiently smooth scalar field, dispersive oscillations can produce unphysical scalar excursions [17]. These excursions are commonly mitigated using upwind schemes [18,19], or bound-preserving limiters [20,21], both of which introduce artificial dissipation and can lower the accuracy of numerical solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From among the desirable properties of high-order accuracy, conservation, and boundedness, numerical schemes generally satisfy the former two properties but do not strictly impose the third. To enforce scalar boundedness, commonly-used approaches compromise either accuracy, for example with bound-preserving low-order schemes [18,19,21], or conservation, with semi-Lagrangian schemes employing bounded interpolation [20]. In this work, limiting approaches for incompressible-flow simulations that ensure scalar boundedness and conservation while preserving uniform high-order accuracy are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation