2017
DOI: 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2017.7.mwsf-336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable Processing History Detector for JPEG Images

Abstract: Knowing the history of global processing applied to an image can be very important for the forensic analyst to correctly establish the image pedigree, trustworthiness, and integrity. Global edits have been proposed in the past for "laundering" manipulated content because they can negatively affect the reliability of many forensic techniques. In this paper, we focus on the more difficult and less addressed case when the processed image is JPEG compressed. First, a bank of binary linear classifiers with rich med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of the initial experiment in this section is to assess the capability of the proposed CNN in comparison with our previous work [7] that employed a maximum likelihood detector operating in projections of rich feature representations. To this end, we use a rather simple (sandboxed) experimental setup, which is exactly the same as in [7], to limit the distortion applied to the image after processing and to limit the input source diversity. The processing is applied to never-compressed images and then the images are directly saved as JPEGs.…”
Section: Comparison To ML Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of the initial experiment in this section is to assess the capability of the proposed CNN in comparison with our previous work [7] that employed a maximum likelihood detector operating in projections of rich feature representations. To this end, we use a rather simple (sandboxed) experimental setup, which is exactly the same as in [7], to limit the distortion applied to the image after processing and to limit the input source diversity. The processing is applied to never-compressed images and then the images are directly saved as JPEGs.…”
Section: Comparison To ML Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work started with our prior research on this topic [7], which was a maximum-likelihood (ML) detector based on modeling the distribution of projections of a rich feature on eigen-processes determined by binary linear classifiers trained to distinguish between unprocessed images and images processed with a fixed class of processing. In this paper, we propose an alternative detector constructed using the tools of deep learning as a CNN with softmax over five output neurons corresponding to four processing classes and the unprocessed class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have therefore investigated whether it is possible to use the same feature set for detecting the IPP. Several papers have been published showing the usefulness of steganalysis features for digital image forensics and in particular for detecting image manipulations [3,17]. The ensemble classifier (EC) yielding excellent results for steganalysis using large feature sets, in the current paper the EC is also used for constructing a supervised classifier of the IPP.…”
Section: Image Processing Pipeline (Ipp) Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the noise residual, extracted through some high-pass filtering of the image, contains a wealth of information on the in-camera and out-camera processes involved in the image formation. Such subtle traces, hardly visible without enhancement, may reveal anomalies due to object insertion [14], [15] or can detect different types of image editing operations [7], [9], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%