2002
DOI: 10.1080/01431160110092867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Savanna and tropical rainforest biomass estimation and spatialization using JERS-1 data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
58
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Those areas of primary forest present σ 0 hh = -7.51 dB± 3.34, σ 0 hv = -12.25dB ±3.15 and σ 0 vv = -7.53dB ± 3.24; secondary succession areas, which represent intermediate and advanced phases (characterized by the old regeneration age and also by the vertical structure) present σ 0 hh = -7.38 dB± 2.34, σ 0 hv = -11.95dB ± 2.27 and σ 0 vv = -7.06dB ± 2.29. The values found in this study are coherent with those obtained by Hoekman and Quiñones (2000), SAATCHI et al (1997), SANTOS et al (2002), whose variability can be attributed to general differences in the horizontal and vertical structure of the strata from the forest typologies. This also shows that the sensor SAR-R99B presents an adequate radiometric response.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Those areas of primary forest present σ 0 hh = -7.51 dB± 3.34, σ 0 hv = -12.25dB ±3.15 and σ 0 vv = -7.53dB ± 3.24; secondary succession areas, which represent intermediate and advanced phases (characterized by the old regeneration age and also by the vertical structure) present σ 0 hh = -7.38 dB± 2.34, σ 0 hv = -11.95dB ± 2.27 and σ 0 vv = -7.06dB ± 2.29. The values found in this study are coherent with those obtained by Hoekman and Quiñones (2000), SAATCHI et al (1997), SANTOS et al (2002), whose variability can be attributed to general differences in the horizontal and vertical structure of the strata from the forest typologies. This also shows that the sensor SAR-R99B presents an adequate radiometric response.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There are several interaction mechanisms of the radar signal with forest targets, such as: multiple backscatter within the canopy (volumetric scattering), direct scattering from the tree trunks, scattering from the interaction canopy-soil, scattering from the interaction trunk-soil (double bounce), whose intensities depend on the SAR wavelengths, on the polarization, on the angle of incidence and on the terrain parameters. (CLOUDE and POTTIER, 1997;FREEMAN and DURDEN, 1998) According several studies (SAATCHI et al, 1997;HOEKMAN and QUINÕNES, 2000;SANTOS et al, 2002), SAR data are also used to model forest volume and biomass estimation, using the polarimetric backscatter attributes. Depending on the frequency of the sensor, there is a saturation of radar signal for those areas with high biomass concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While ground conditions also affect backscatter for low biomass levels, the majority of studies have observed that JERS backscatter increases, with few exceptions, with increasing biomass over tropical (Castel, Guerra, Caraglio, & Houllier, 2002;Kuplich, Salvatori, & Curran, 2000;Luckman, Baker, Honsák, & Lucas, 1998;Santos, Pardi Lacruz, Araujo, & Keil, 2002) and boreal forests (Fransson & Israelsson, 1999;). However, the backscatter level and sensitivity vary with tree species, non-forest vegetation and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Ers and Jers Sar In Forestry Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have investigated the role of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data to estimate aboveground biomass (Austin et al 2003;Harrell et al 1997;Luckman et al 1998;Santos et al 2002). SAR data are sensitive to geometric properties of the forest; thus, they are more directly related to measurements of aboveground biomass than optical remote sensing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%