Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics

Abstract

for helpful comments on this article. This manuscript was processed and accepted during the tenure of the previous editor, Russell S. Winer. VIKAS MITTAL and WAGNER A. KAMAKURA*Despite the claim that satisfaction ratings are linked to repurchase behavior, few attempts can be found that relate satisfaction ratings to actual repurchase behavior. This article fills this void by presenting a conceptual model for relating satisfaction ratings and repurchase behavior. The model is based on the premise that ratings observed in a typical customer satisfaction survey are error-prone measures of the customer's true satisfaction, and they may vary systematically on the basis of consumer characteristics. The authors apply the model to a large-scale study of 100,040 automotive customers. Results show that consumers with different characteristics have different thresholds such that, at the same level of rated satisfaction, repurchase rates are systematically different among different customer groups. The authors also find that the nature and extent of response bias in satisfaction ratings varies by customer characteristics. In one group, the response bias is so high that rated satisfaction is completely uncorrelated to repurchase behavior (r = 0). Furthermore, the authors find that, though nonlinear, the functional form relating rated satisfaction to repurchase intent is different from the one relating it to repurchase behavior. Although the functional form exhibits decreasing returns in the case of repurchase intent, it exhibits monotonically increasing returns in the case of repurchase behavior.

An empirical investigation of the impact of communication timing on customer equity

“…In response to this emerging understanding of the role of customer relationship management, researchers have started studying customer retention (e.g., Thomas, 2001;Mittal and Kamakura, 2001;Bolton, 1998;Smith, Bolton, and Wagner, 1999). To date, this research has focused almost exclusively on collecting customer satisfaction data (mainly in service industries) to understand customer defection and the revenue streams arising from active customers.…”

Late-Life Mental Health Education for Workforce Development: Brain Versus Heart?

“…Each educational encounter with students can be considered a marketing “touch”, and an opportunity to further enhance cognitive, as well as affective domains of learning. To the extent that customers’ (students’) attitudes strongly predict behaviors, 10 educational experiences that positively impact affective knowledge towards seniors is important for future workforce development. If attitudes are modified through multiple emotionally charged “touches”, we may further stimulate students’ interests in working with seniors as they consider their future career paths.…”

Ordinal Evaluation: A New Perspective on Country Images

“…However, this traditional view on the functioning of marketing phenomena is challenged by some authors [1,6,7,4]. In particular, Prospect Theory and its assumptions of loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity has brought several marketing scholars to alter their views on classic decision making mechanisms such as upward and downward reinforcement.…”

“…In particular, Prospect Theory and its assumptions of loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity has brought several marketing scholars to alter their views on classic decision making mechanisms such as upward and downward reinforcement. For instance, within the field of customer satisfaction, a number of studies were capable of demonstrating that the relationship between attribute levels and overall satisfaction is rather asymmetric and S-shaped [7,8,11]. In contrast with research on customer satisfaction, the COO-literature about asymmetric and non-linear mechanisms is rather scarce.…”