2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite detection of carbon monoxide emission prior to the Gujarat earthquake of 26 January 2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations both in nitric oxide (Matsuda and Ikeya, 2001) and atmospheric Rn concentration (Yasuka et al, 2006) prior to the January 1995 Kobe earthquake indicated gases emitted from the crust in the epicentral area. In addition, higher values of CO concentrations deduced from MOPITT satellite at the levels of 1000 and 850 hPa one week prior to the 26 January 2001 Gujarat M s = 7.6 earthquake were found (Singh et al, 2010a). In the studied cases, obvious anomalies of CO concentration along the San Andreas Fault in March and April associated with the 5 April 2010 Baja California M s = 7.1 earthquake (Fig.…”
Section: Anomalies Of Co Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variations both in nitric oxide (Matsuda and Ikeya, 2001) and atmospheric Rn concentration (Yasuka et al, 2006) prior to the January 1995 Kobe earthquake indicated gases emitted from the crust in the epicentral area. In addition, higher values of CO concentrations deduced from MOPITT satellite at the levels of 1000 and 850 hPa one week prior to the 26 January 2001 Gujarat M s = 7.6 earthquake were found (Singh et al, 2010a). In the studied cases, obvious anomalies of CO concentration along the San Andreas Fault in March and April associated with the 5 April 2010 Baja California M s = 7.1 earthquake (Fig.…”
Section: Anomalies Of Co Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The ozone concentration was low on the day of the earthquake occurrence, increased gradually after the event and reached a maximum value and thereafter decreased to its normal value (Ganguly, 2009;Singh et al, 2007). In addition, increases of CO concentration deduced from Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) occurred prior to the 26 January 2001 Gujarat M s = 7.6 earthquake (Singh et al, 2010a), the 15 January 2001 Taiwan M s = 7.5 earthquake (Guo et al, 2006), the 6 June 2000 Jingtai M s = 5.9 earthquake in Gansu Province, northwestern China (Yao et al, 2005) and the M s = 6.9 earthquake of 8 June 2000 in northern Myanmar (Yao et al, 2005). An anomalous variation of the total column water vapor after the Gujarat earthquake was also retrieved using SSM/I microwave radiometer on Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite (Dey et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, anomalous changes to the ground, atmosphere and ionosphere, observed by both Earth-and space-based instrumentation, were found to be associated with several earthquakes that occurred in China, Taiwan, Europe and Japan (Walia et al 2006, Yasuoka et al 2006, Cioni et al 2007, Omori et al 2007, Sharma et al 2008, Anagnostopoulos et al 2010b, Hayakawa and Hobara 2010, Singh et al 2010a. These recent reported pronounced changes in the various surface and atmospheric parameters a few days prior to various earthquakes provide a strong evidence of lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An enhancement in nitric oxide mixing ratio of ten times larger than the average peak level of normal days were reported by Matsuda and Ikeya (2001) before the Kobe earthquake on 17 January 1995. Singh et al (2010a) reported anomalous changes in CO concentrations prior to the main earthquake in Gujarat on 26 January 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%