Animal Disease Surveillance and Survey Systems 2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780470344866.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling Considerations in Surveys and Monitoring and Surveillance Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cornerstone of risk-based sampling strategies is stratification of the target population into categories that display heterogeneity in probability of harbouring a hazard, or heterogeneity in the severity of consequence if the hazard is present. The probability of individual units within strata to be sampled can nevertheless be calculated, which makes this type of sampling a special case of probability sampling and different from non-probability or purposive sampling as described by Cameron et al (2003). Strata to be used for risk-based sampling are derived from epidemiological studies assessing the probability of occurrence of the hazard in the stratum (e.g.…”
Section: Risk-based Selection Of Population Stratamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cornerstone of risk-based sampling strategies is stratification of the target population into categories that display heterogeneity in probability of harbouring a hazard, or heterogeneity in the severity of consequence if the hazard is present. The probability of individual units within strata to be sampled can nevertheless be calculated, which makes this type of sampling a special case of probability sampling and different from non-probability or purposive sampling as described by Cameron et al (2003). Strata to be used for risk-based sampling are derived from epidemiological studies assessing the probability of occurrence of the hazard in the stratum (e.g.…”
Section: Risk-based Selection Of Population Stratamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic elements for estimating sample size are the confidence level to be used, the Se and Sp of the diagnostic test, the establishment of a minimum prevalence detected and the probability of erroneously concluding the presence of the disease when it is not found (Thrusfield ; Cameron et al . ; Dohoo et al . ).…”
Section: Number Of Feral Fish Sampled By Lake and Species Los Lagos mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the lakes where the sample size was fulfilled, it can be stated with 95% confidence level that salmon pancreas disease virus (SPDV/SAV), if it is present, would be at a prevalence lower than 1%; that is, it is likely that the agent is not present in the population of feral salmonids from those lakes (Cameron et al . ). In the case of the wild fish species, at least it can be stated that the sampled individuals were free of the PD agent in all tested lakes.…”
Section: Number Of Feral Fish Sampled By Lake and Species Los Lagos mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using clean gloves for each pen, samples were collected from five different places within a pen for a total of about 200 g faeces. The sampled pens were purposively selected [18] from a room containing pigs closest to market weight. Modifications to this protocol were made on farms that had fewer than five pens per room.…”
Section: Pen Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%