2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage radical prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: Indications and results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical complications are certainly a matter of concern; however, studies have suggested that SRP is a safe procedure and shown acceptable functional outcomes [8,23,24]. A recent study with 55 patients has demonstrated a low perioperative complication rate of <10%, with only two cases of rectal injury (3.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical complications are certainly a matter of concern; however, studies have suggested that SRP is a safe procedure and shown acceptable functional outcomes [8,23,24]. A recent study with 55 patients has demonstrated a low perioperative complication rate of <10%, with only two cases of rectal injury (3.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal of Surgical Oncology Ward et al [12] 138 52% (no pads) Na 10 years PFS 77% Bianco et al [13] and Stephenson et al [11] 100 39% (no pads) 84% 5 years PFS 55% Heidenreich et al [14] 21 78% (<2 pads) Na 1 year PFS 92% Van der Poel et al [5] 27 37% (no pads) 93% 5 years PFS 33% Sanderson et al [6] 51 47% (no pads) Decreased QOL/PCI: 13-66 5 years PFS 47% Darras et al [15] 11 45% (no pads) 100% 6.9 years PFS 55% QOL/PCI ¼ Quality of life/UCLA Prostate Cancer Index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Los trabajos que analizan el uso de RT adyuvante o de rescate después de PR observan mayores efectos adversos sexuales y rectales, sin empeoramientos no obstante del estado de continencia que se presentaba tras la PR 8 , incluso después de un rescate con RT de alta tasa (70 Gy) 9 . Cuando el tratamiento primario es RT y se opta por una PR de rescate la morbilidad se multiplica, incluso en manos expertas, con tasas de incontinencia superiores al 50% 10 , aumentando además el riesgo de esclerosis cervical y la pérdida completa de potencia sexual en los pacientes que todavía la conservaban 11 . Además, existe un mayor riesgo de lesión rectal durante la PR en el territorio irradiado, que probablemente condenará al paciente a una colostomía definitiva.…”
Section: Resultados Funcionalesunclassified