Sağlık çalışanlarında kas-iskelet sorunları, yaşam kalitesi ve depresyon

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to determine level of the musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), quality of life, fatigue, and depression among the healthcare professionals. Materials and Methods:Questionnaires including the professional quality of life (ProQOL R-IV), which is composed of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and compassion fatigue subscales, beck depression inventory (BDI), and working-related MSD were distributed to the 450 avaible healthcare givers. This descriptive study was carried out in Atatürk Educational and Research Hospital between January 2012 and July 2013. Results:Mean age was 33.71 ± 8.9 years in this study. MSD were reported in 82.8% of the study subjects. 45.5% of healthcare providers suffered from high risk scores for compassion satisfaction, 21.5% for burnout and 29.7% for compassion fatigue. Physicians had statistically significantly high risks scores for all subscales of ProQOL R-IV in comparison with other healthcare providers. Conclusion:Being a healthcare provider, especially a physician, constitutes high risk factor for poor QOL. Young age, shorter duration of work experience, and existence of musculoskeletal problems comprises important risks for depression and self-reported fatigue among healthcare providers.Keywords: Healthcare, musculoskeletal disorders, quality of life. Öz Amaç: Çalışma, profesyonel sağlık çalışanlarında kas-iskelet sorunları, yaşam kalitesi, yorgunluk ve depresyon düzeylerini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Mesleki tatmin, tükenmişlik ve mesleki yorgunluk alt skalalarından oluşan profesyonellerde yaşam kalitesi ölçeği (ProQOL R-IV), beck depression inventory (BDI), ve meslekle ilişkili kas-iskelet sorunlarına (KİS) dair sorgulamalar, ulaşılabilen 450 sağlık çalışanına rastgele dağıtıldı. Bu tanımlayıcı çalışma, Atatürk Eğitim ve

Crps Type 2 Case Whom Was Presented with Allodynia and Without Vasomotor and Sudomotor Changes

“…Özellikle herhangi bir sinir hasarı olmadan karşımıza çıkan KBAS Tip 1, bazen hastayı etiyolojiye sebep olan rahatsızlıktan daha fazla etkilemektedir. 3 Tanı, genellikle klinik olarak konur. Fakat tanıyı doğrulamada, radyolojik incelemeler ve sintigrafi yardımcı olur.…”