SAGA GIS for Computing Multispectral Vegetation Indices by Landsat TM for Mapping Vegetation Greenness

Abstract

Summary The study presents a comparative analysis of eight Vegetation Indices (VIs) used to examine vegetation greenness over the northern coasts of Iceland. The geographical extent of the study area is set by the coordinates of the two fjords, Eyjafjörður and Skagafjörður, notable for their agricultural significance. Vegetation in Iceland is fragile due to the harsh climate, climate change, overgrazing and volcanic activity, which increase soil erosion. The study was conducted on a Landsat TM image using SAGA GIS as a technical tool for raster bands calculations. The NDVI dataset shows a range from -0.56 to 0.24, with 0 indicating ‘no vegetation’, and negative values – ‘other surfaces’ (e.g. rocks, open terrain). The DVI, compared to the NDVI, shows statistically non-normalized values ranging from -112 to 0, with extreme negative values while the coastal vegetation areas are badly distinguished from the water areas. The NRVI shows an extent from -0.24 to 0.48 with higher values for vegetation. The NRVI reduces topographic, solar and atmospheric effects and creates a normal data distribution. RVI shows a range in a dataset from 0.2 to 3.2 with vegetation in the river valleys clearly visible and depicted, while the water areas have values 0.8 to 1.0. The CTVI shows corrected TVI, in a data range -0.10 to 1.10, as the dataset of NDVI were negative. The TVI dataset ranges from 0.44 to 0.80 with the ice-covered areas and glaciers distinguishable and water values within a range from 0.60 to 0.64 and the vegetation from 0.60 to 0.44. The TTVI dataset ranges from 0.40 to 0.80 performing similarly to the TVI, but more refined with vegetation values 0.64 to 0.68. SAVI dataset ranges from -0.80 to 0.30 with minimized effects of soil on the vegetation through a constant soil adjustment factor added into the NDVI formula. The paper presents a comparison of eight VIs for Arctic vegetation monitoring. The overall behavior of SAGA GIS in calculation and mapping of the VIs is effective in terms of their use for vegetation mapping of the region.

Mapping Submarine Geomorphology of the Philippine and Mariana Trenches By an Automated Approach Using GMT Scripts

“…In general, the GMT-based ML method for automation of mapping largely improved modelling accuracy and reliability. In contrast to the traditional mapping techniques with standard user menu, e.g., ArcGIS, SAGA GIS (Hilst and Seno, 1993;Suetova et al, 2005;Klauèo et al, 2013;Lemenkova, 2020e;2021d;2021e), GMT is notable for scripting algorithm as a core methodology, as demonstrated in this paper.…”

Seismicity in the Afar Depression and Great Rift Valley, Ethiopia

“…Despite widely used GIS in geosciences (Coltorti et al, 2009;Poppe et al, 2013;Klaučo et al, 2014;Lemenkova et al, 2012, Lemenkova, 2021Sembroni et al, 2017), the application of GMT scripting in mapping continues to grow due to the advantages of the automatization in cartography achieved through coding (Gauger et al, 2007;Lemenkova, 2019aLemenkova, , 2019bLemenkova, , 2019c. The significant advantage of scripting consists in the increased precision, speed, and quality of data processing and visualization (Brus, 2019;Lemenkov & Lemenkova, 2021;Becker, 2005;Lemenkova, 2019dPignalberi, 2021).…”

Tanzania Craton, Serengeti Plain and Eastern Rift Valley: mapping of geospatial data by scripting techniques

“…The 'tmap' package of R (Tennekes 2018) designed for generating maps employs the scripting approach based on the R syntax (Lemenkova 2020d) rather than the traditional GIS (e.g. Suetova et al 2005;Lemenkova 2011Lemenkova , 2021cKlaučo et al 2014Klaučo et al , 2017. The R script used for plotting Figs 6-9 is provided in the…”