1991
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-54233-7_126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety for branching time semantics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a state q reachable in sem(S, V ), an induction using properties (1), (2), and (3) The following examples show that refined interfaces solve the issues raised in Examples 2 and 3 of Section 3. …”
Section: By Definition Of Semi-composition Q[k] T[k] − − → Q [K] Belmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given a state q reachable in sem(S, V ), an induction using properties (1), (2), and (3) The following examples show that refined interfaces solve the issues raised in Examples 2 and 3 of Section 3. …”
Section: By Definition Of Semi-composition Q[k] T[k] − − → Q [K] Belmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, reductions of the interface can be achieved by first hiding uncontrolled actions and then minimizing the Lts modulo a relation preserving observable traces (e.g., safety equivalence [2]), which permits reduction of the number of states to explore while calculating semi-composition. Safety minimization is less expensive than determinization and, unlike determinization which can induce a dramatic growth of the Lts, yields an Lts that contains fewer states than the input.…”
Section: Definition 4 (Semi-composition) Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety properties can be represented by prefix closed finite automata on finite words [28,7]. We assume such a representation A S and proceed as follows:…”
Section: Verifying Safety Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, model checking can handle arbitrary temporal formulas which can represent both safety and liveness properties. Nevertheless, it has been noticed that restricting model-checking like techniques to safety properties can lead to better verification algorithms [7,8,9]. Intuitively, this can be understood by the fact that safety properties can be checked by only considering the finite behaviors of a system whereas liveness properties are only meaningful for infinite behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This temporal logic is suitable for expressing safety properties (cf. [4]) in terms of sequences of method invocations, such as security policies restricting access to given resources by means of API method calls (cf. [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%