Safety Assessment of Rehabilitation Robots: A Review Identifying Safety Skills and Current Knowledge Gaps

Abstract

The assessment of rehabilitation robot safety is a vital aspect of the development process, which is often experienced as difficult. There are gaps in best practices and knowledge to ensure safe usage of rehabilitation robots. Currently, safety is commonly assessed by monitoring adverse events occurrence. The aim of this article is to explore how safety of rehabilitation robots can be assessed early in the development phase, before they are used with patients. We are suggesting a uniform approach for safety validation of robots closely interacting with humans, based on safety skills and validation protocols. Safety skills are an abstract representation of the ability of a robot to reduce a specific risk or deal with a specific hazard. They can be implemented in various ways, depending on the application requirements, which enables the use of a single safety skill across a wide range of applications and domains. Safety validation protocols have been developed that correspond to these skills and consider domain-specific conditions. This gives robot users and developers concise testing procedures to prove the mechanical safety of their robotic system, even when the applications are in domains with a lack of standards and best practices such as the healthcare domain. Based on knowledge about adverse events occurring in rehabilitation robot use, we identified multi-directional excessive forces on the soft tissue level and musculoskeletal level as most relevant hazards for rehabilitation robots and related them to four safety skills, providing a concrete starting point for safety assessment of rehabilitation robots. We further identified a number of gaps which need to be addressed in the future to pave the way for more comprehensive guidelines for rehabilitation robot safety assessments. Predominantly, besides new developments of safety by design features, there is a strong need for reliable measurement methods as well as acceptable limit values for human-robot interaction forces both on skin and joint level.

Retrospective Robot-Measured Upper Limb Kinematic Data From Stroke Patients Are Novel Biomarkers

“…This outcome has been subsequently confirmed by Mehrholz et al who reviewed the literature on the efficacy of upper limb Robot-assisted Therapy (ulRT) in improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength (6). The efficacy (7)(8)(9)(10)(11), acceptability (12), safety (13), and cost-effectiveness (14) of ulRT in stroke patients are well-established in literature.…”

Professionals' Views and Experiences of Using Rehabilitation Robotics With Stroke Survivors: A Mixed Methods Survey

“…Alternatively if costs are minimized, then the range of users is likely to be limited. In reality, commercialization of rehabilitation robots needs to balance these competing demands with a priority to ease of use as the mismatch between the demands of operating devices and other aspects of clinical practice has rendered many promising health technologies unfit for purpose (31)(32)(33). Future robot development work needs to consider these issues.…”

Implementing Ethical, Legal, and Societal Considerations in Wearable Robot Design

“…Harm-benefit analyses usually seek to determine benefit profiles and justifiable risks connected to the development and use of WRs [42], but these can be user dependent. The recent work by Bessler et al [43,44] showed that there are multiple adverse effects and safety hazards linked to the use of robotics and their interaction with the human body.…”