2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/case48305.2020.9216891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe Motion Planning for an Uncertain Non-Holonomic System with Temporal Logic Specification

Abstract: We propose a sampling-based motion planning algorithm for systems with complex dynamics and temporal logic specifications allowing to tackle sophisticated missions. By complex dynamics we refer to non-holonomy and disturbance that prevent implementation of an exact steer function. We instead construct a set of feedback motion primitives guaranteeing bounded state uncertainty (and thus safety) allowing the system to follow an arbitrarily long trajectory without replanning. The motion primitives allow to use A -… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robots must be capable of dealing with such uncertainty at runtime, without impacting too much on their expected productivity. The path planning problem has been extensively discussed in the literature ( Kavraki et al, 1996 ; Mac et al, 2016 ; Costa and Silva, 2019 ; Mannucci et al, 2019 ; Tajvar et al, 2020 ) as one important aspect to be able to guarantee a safe operation of the robot, and avoid collision with humans, robots, or other unexpected objects present in the environment. However, an efficient feasible path may not be easy to find at runtime, e.g., due to physical constraints of the environment, and the robot may need to stop waiting for the path to be cleared or make an extended detour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robots must be capable of dealing with such uncertainty at runtime, without impacting too much on their expected productivity. The path planning problem has been extensively discussed in the literature ( Kavraki et al, 1996 ; Mac et al, 2016 ; Costa and Silva, 2019 ; Mannucci et al, 2019 ; Tajvar et al, 2020 ) as one important aspect to be able to guarantee a safe operation of the robot, and avoid collision with humans, robots, or other unexpected objects present in the environment. However, an efficient feasible path may not be easy to find at runtime, e.g., due to physical constraints of the environment, and the robot may need to stop waiting for the path to be cleared or make an extended detour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same authors then introduce in [7] sampling bias guided by the automaton capturing the LTL, something that [13] also proposes in a similar fashion. Lastly, besides proposing a heuristic to guide the search, [16] integrates feedback control laws to guarantee feasibility of plans by robots with complex, possibly non-holonomic, dynamics. Although these works propose ways of improving the time taken to find a plan, they all rely on having details of the environment a priori.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principled guidance of a lowlevel motion tree has been shown to improve tractability in the deterministic setting for both single and multi-temporal goals planning, using layers of planning [4], [5], [23], [24] or heuristic guidance [6]. For stochastic systems, [25] proposes a heuristic to guide tree extension, but their framework is only designed for dynamics noise. Extending these techniques to settings with both motion and measurement uncertainty is non-trivial because of the difficulty in constructing a guidance mechanism that captures belief dynamics well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%