2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02646.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: optimizing outcome and managing complications

Abstract: An improved outcome of SNS can be achieved by selecting the best possible stimulation parameters individualized to each patient. Further research into the optimal settings is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 This may represent poor surgical technique or a placebo effect. Despite the mixed and diverse origin of FI in the 23 patients who underwent successful temporary SNS, all patients in our series had good efficacy after permanent implant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 This may represent poor surgical technique or a placebo effect. Despite the mixed and diverse origin of FI in the 23 patients who underwent successful temporary SNS, all patients in our series had good efficacy after permanent implant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended that the initial follow‐up visits and subsequent follow‐up visits should be spaced at least 1 month apart because full evaluation of setting changes may not be meaningful if the interval is less . Based on the experience that a proportion of patients requires reprogramming in the early phase of follow‐up, more than one follow‐up visit in the first year is recommended …”
Section: Post‐operative and Follow‐up Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 It is recommended that the initial follow-up visits and subsequent follow-up visits should be spaced at least 1 month apart because full evaluation of setting changes may not be meaningful if the interval is less. 138 Based on the experience that a proportion of patients requires reprogramming in the early phase of follow-up, more than one follow-up visit in the first year is recommended. 100,139 Subsequent yearly follow-up visits are advised by international expert groups, 100,125 but no consensus on the timing and interval of follow-up was determined on recent systematic review.…”
Section: Follow-up Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although peripheral stimulation is performed periodically, not continuously, the effect achieved is satisfactory. The same occurs in those patients in whom the pulse generator was turned off at night to save power without affecting continence .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%