Russian Logistics in the Ukrainian War: Can Operational Failures be Attributed to logistics?

Abstract

The lacking Russian progress in war in Ukraine is often attributed to failing logistics, yet the logistics and its eventually failure is not explained. The purpose with this paper is to present some logistics principles that can be used to describe the Russian way of logistics planning, and to infer whether failing logistics slowed down the military operations or if failing operational conduct led to revised operational plans that could not be sustained logistically. The initial Russian Course of Action (COA) to take Kyiv was probably well supported logistically. When the COA failed, contingency plans most likely did not take into consideration the logistical challenges of supporting another type of operation, partly because of the logistics vacuum resulting from the preceding exercises. In the southeast the logistical concept seems to build on the echelon principle, which fits poorly with the lack of operational success. Adding to this is successful Ukrainian tactics of targeting Russian logistics resources which significantly reduces the Russian fighting power. This assessment is based on openly accessible information about the Russian campaign. Reporting from an ongoing war poses challenges of verifying data. Both warring parties and other stakeholders pursue their own interest through strategic communication. Yet, by combining different sources we believe that our findings are quite robust. For future research, archival studies both in Ukraine and Russia, combined with interviews with logistics personnel at both sides would add new dimensions to the research. We realise though that such data sources will not be accessible for quite some time.

Editors’ Note: Stocktaking of an Emergent Field After Five Years of the Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies

“…"Scandinavian" refers, rather, to any military studies topic relevant for smaller states. Such topics range from future warfare (Coker, 2019;Kilcullen, 2019;Betz, 2019) to war gaming, command and logistics (Roennfeldt, 2022;Sjøgren, 2022;Skoglund, Listou, & Ekström, 2022), and they even include studies of subjects such as civil-military relations in Turkey and Israeli territorial defence (Genç Yılmaz, 2023;Druck, 2023). In other words, "Scandinavian" refers to empirical investigations of military matters related to the Nordic countries and the conceptual interest of small countries.…”

Стійкість Суспільства В Теорії Та Практиці

“…Russia simultaneously attacked Ukraine from the north, east and south. It is likely that Russia expected its invasion to be a blitzkrieg operation [1]. However, after meeting intense defence from Ukraine, the Russians regrouped and reinforced the operation to the East and the South.…”

“…Analysis of recent research and publications. The analysis of the latest scientific research and publications [1,3,4,48] shows that a number of works of predecessors, who in their time made a significant contribution to the development of the theory of military science, are devoted to the analysis of the stability of logistics in the russian-ukrainian war. But few studies have been conducted on the analysis of the logistical aspects of the russian-ukrainian war in the context of the stability of society and the Armed Forces of Ukraine, especially at the beginning of the large-scale armed aggression of Russia and the territory of independent Ukraine.…”