2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test: Normative data, discriminant validity and test–retest reliability in Greek adults

Abstract: Rapidly expanding interest in neuropsychological assessment in Greece has made the development of appropriate culture-specific normative data for core neuropsychological measures essential. In the present study, we sought to establish normative, test-retest reliability and discriminant validity data for the Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test in the Greek adult population. We administered the test using standard procedures to 218 healthy Greek adults (95 men), aged 17-80 years and two adult patient groups (2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine treatment mediation, 2 dummy variables were created corresponding with these planned contrasts. To provide an interpretable measure of the clinical significance of any observed treatment effects, we used available standardized regression-based modeling strategies26,27 to estimate changes in predicted age using pretreatment and then posttreatment neurocognitive performance, holding education and demographic factors constant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine treatment mediation, 2 dummy variables were created corresponding with these planned contrasts. To provide an interpretable measure of the clinical significance of any observed treatment effects, we used available standardized regression-based modeling strategies26,27 to estimate changes in predicted age using pretreatment and then posttreatment neurocognitive performance, holding education and demographic factors constant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As accuracy measures, particularly those measured in healthy populations, tend to approach ceiling, it is possible that the Go/No-go and Item working memory performance accuracy measures with our current sample are not sufficiently varied to provide a representative account of test-retest reliability. This could be one reason why the ICCs for accuracy measures are often reported to be lower overall than the corresponding RT scores (e.g., Llorente et al, 2001 ; Messinis et al, 2007 ; Zabel et al, 2009 ; Hahn et al, 2011 ; Wöstmann et al, 2013 ). In the case of the DalCAB assessment presented here, participants were highly accurate in all presentations of both the Go/No-go and Item working memory tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…including Trail Making Tests A and B, 16 the Stroop test, 17 the Ruff 2&7 Test, 18 the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), 19 the WAIS Digit Span Test (DST), 19 the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) Verbal Paired Associates and Logical Memory subtests, 20 the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA), 21 and the Animal Naming Test. 22 These tests have been widely advocated for this psychometric properties 23,24 and sensitivity to subtle deficits in medical populations, particularly for frontal-lobe mediated functioning. 25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA), 21 and the Animal Naming Test. 22 These tests have been widely advocated for this psychometric properties 23,24 and sensitivity to subtle deficits in medical populations, particularly for frontal lobe-mediated functioning. 25 The Stroop test 17 consists of 3 timed sections: word, color, and color-word.…”
Section: Clinical and Demographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%