2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ROX index and SpO2/FiO2 ratio for predicting high-flow nasal cannula failure in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients: A multicenter retrospective study

Abstract: Background The ratio of oxygen saturation (ROX) index, defined as the ratio of oxygen saturation (SpO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to respiratory rate, can help identify patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure at high risk for intubation following high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) initiation; however, whether it is effective for predicting intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients receiving HFNC remains unknown. Moreover, the SpO2/FiO2 ratio has been assessed as a prognostic marker fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some studies have shown that SpO 2 /FiO 2 after HFNO initiation might be a good indicator of HFNO success in treating COVID-19 patients. Kim et al [ 18 ] reported that ROX index and SpO 2 /FiO 2 were acceptable predictors for HFNC failure among COVID-19 patients. Results of AUROC revealed that the ratio SpO 2 /FiO 2 at 1 and 4 hours were 0.762 (95% CI: 0.679–0.846) and 0.733 (95% CI: 0.640–0.826), respectively, signifying better prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some studies have shown that SpO 2 /FiO 2 after HFNO initiation might be a good indicator of HFNO success in treating COVID-19 patients. Kim et al [ 18 ] reported that ROX index and SpO 2 /FiO 2 were acceptable predictors for HFNC failure among COVID-19 patients. Results of AUROC revealed that the ratio SpO 2 /FiO 2 at 1 and 4 hours were 0.762 (95% CI: 0.679–0.846) and 0.733 (95% CI: 0.640–0.826), respectively, signifying better prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A significantly higher ROX index was recorded in the success group than the failure group (5.9 vs. 4.8, respectively.) Kim et al, 2022 [ 18 ] Multicenter retrospective Study 133 hypoxemic COVID-19 patients (79 males and 54 females) with a mean age of 70 years were analyzed HFNC oxygen therapy 12 HFNC success was observed in 63 patients, while failure was observed in 70 patients. Significantly higher ROX indices were observed in the success group than in the failure group (8.77 vs. 6.85, 9.33 vs. 7.67, 9.70 vs. 8.64 after 1, 4, and 12 hours, respectively.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(40, 41) PaO 2 is derived from an arterial blood gas, gives only a "snapshot" of a patient's oxygen status, and requires direct patient contact. (41) This maybe an issue when patients are in isolation rooms and there is a need to minimize contact and conserve resources. (40) However, pulse oximetry can overestimate the oxygen saturation in patients with darker skin complexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 A standard parameter to evaluate HFNC failure in adults is the SF ratio, which is the ratio of SpO 2 to FiO 2 . 7 Another parameter as a predictor of HFNC therapy that is widely used in adult patients is respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index, de ned as the ratio of SF to the respiratory rate (RR). 8 Roca et al evaluated the ROX index in the adult population with pneumonia, cut-off value > 4.88 at 12 hours after HFNC therapy, with a sensitivity of 70% and speci city of 72.4%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%