2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational Behavior of Bolted Beam-to-Column Connections with Locally Cross-Laminated Glulam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deformability ratios of reinforced connections wrapped using 1and 2 CFRP sheets were 78% and 72% higher than the non-reinforced connections, respectively. The deformability ratios of CFRP-reinforced connections were lower than these of locally cross-laminated connections (3.5, reported by Wang et al [8]), since the debonding failures prematurely took place between the glulam members and CFRP sheets.…”
Section: Deformability Of Unreinforced and Cfrp-reinforced Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The deformability ratios of reinforced connections wrapped using 1and 2 CFRP sheets were 78% and 72% higher than the non-reinforced connections, respectively. The deformability ratios of CFRP-reinforced connections were lower than these of locally cross-laminated connections (3.5, reported by Wang et al [8]), since the debonding failures prematurely took place between the glulam members and CFRP sheets.…”
Section: Deformability Of Unreinforced and Cfrp-reinforced Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Three kinds of rotational angles could be calculated: the rotational angles of the beam and steel plate with respect to the column (θ BC and θ SC , respectively) and the rotational angles of the beam with respect to the steel plate (θ BS ). Three curves of each connection, specifically M column -θ BC , M column -θ SC , and M beam -θ BS could be established and the typical curves were shown in Reference [8]. In this study, only the M column -θ BC relationships of the nonreinforced and CFRP-reinforced connections are compared in Fig.6 for brevity, since M column -θ BC curve is widely accepted by researchers and designers, also due to the ease for comparison with previous test results.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Blaß et al [19] introduced this concept into bolted glulam butt joint connections and found that it improved the performance excellently. Wang et al [20] pre-reinforced the bolted column joints with locally cross-laminated glulam members and found that the reinforcement method was effective. However, there is still no research about the pre-reinforcement of mortise and tenon joints in new wood construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%