2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-014-2105-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root foraging capacity depends on root system architecture and ontogeny in seedlings of three Andean Chenopodium species

Abstract: Aims Morphological and ontogenetic variation in root system architecture holds ecological significance, particularly in low-resource habitats where soil rooting is critical for both seedling establishment and water and nutrient uptake. To assess this variation under contrasted agroecological backgrounds, root architecture and rooting patterns were compared in Andean populations of Chenopodium hircinum, Chenopodium pallidicaule and two ecotypes (wet-and dry-habitat) of Chenopodium quinoa. Methods Seedlings were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response, resource limitations would induce plant functional adjustment consistent with an improvement of the plants' capacity to acquire the limiting resource (Freschet et al, 2018;Valladares et al, 2006;Van Kleunen & Fischer, 2005). In this study, low water availability induced high RLR and RMF, allowing a better exploration and/or exploitation of deeper soil horizons (Freschet et al, 2015), which is consistent with the root foraging theory (Alvarez-Flores et al, 2014;Ho, Rosas, Brown, & Lynch, 2005). In contrast, SLA, LAR, and LMF decreased significantly in the drought treatment in this study, indicating a smaller leaf area per biomass (Marcelis, Heuvelink, & Goudriaan, 1998;Smedt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In response, resource limitations would induce plant functional adjustment consistent with an improvement of the plants' capacity to acquire the limiting resource (Freschet et al, 2018;Valladares et al, 2006;Van Kleunen & Fischer, 2005). In this study, low water availability induced high RLR and RMF, allowing a better exploration and/or exploitation of deeper soil horizons (Freschet et al, 2015), which is consistent with the root foraging theory (Alvarez-Flores et al, 2014;Ho, Rosas, Brown, & Lynch, 2005). In contrast, SLA, LAR, and LMF decreased significantly in the drought treatment in this study, indicating a smaller leaf area per biomass (Marcelis, Heuvelink, & Goudriaan, 1998;Smedt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Drought has developed into a major physiological stressor that influences the distribution, growth, physiological processes, and energy allocation of plants (Franks, 2011). For adaptation in response to drought stress, plants can modify their phenotype and biomass allocation to capture more water and reduce their water loss, thus enabling them to survive in a number of ecological niches (Alvarez-Flores, Winkel, Nguyen-Thi-Truc, & Joffre, 2014). For instance, plants increase their root growth and optimize the biomass partitioning to capture more water via their roots when suffering from water shortage (Munns & Cramer, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the condition of low habitat resources, rooting depth is vital for seedling establishment, water and nutrient absorption, and plant survival among different plant species [18,24,48]. The closely positive correlation between rooting depth and physiological parameters in our study on this small xeric tree disclosed that rooting depth play an important role for plants physiological performance during the prolonged extreme drought period in August.…”
Section: The Important Of Rooting Depthsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Traits for tissue morphology, architecture and physiology may be even more plastic than biomass allocation (Comas et al 2013). Plastic responses to water availability have been observed for physiological traits such as abscisic acid and proline content (Davies and Bacon 2003) and morphological traits and phene aggregates such as specific root length (Padilla et al 2009(Padilla et al , 2013, rooting depth (Reader et al 1993;Alvarez-Flores et al 2014), root length (Bell and Sultan 1999), root:shoot ratios (Padilla et al 2009) and root surface area (Saidi et al 2010). The adaptive value of trait plasticity for seedling performance under drought is, however, highly dependent on the intensity and duration of drought episodes and interactions with other environmental conditions (Tardieu 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%