2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1082/1/012046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room Temperature Synthesis and Characterizations of ZIF-8 Formation at Water-Fatty Alcohols Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found that their mechanism is the same as that of the water-alcohol insoluble monolayer interfaces at the liquid-to-gas interaction. Therefore, the miscibility of the Zn 2+ ions and deprotonated methylimidazole linkers are elevated by increasing the solvents' polarity, which results in greater interaction with the metal ions and, thus, the creation of smaller unit cells [48].…”
Section: Hydrothermal Synthesis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that their mechanism is the same as that of the water-alcohol insoluble monolayer interfaces at the liquid-to-gas interaction. Therefore, the miscibility of the Zn 2+ ions and deprotonated methylimidazole linkers are elevated by increasing the solvents' polarity, which results in greater interaction with the metal ions and, thus, the creation of smaller unit cells [48].…”
Section: Hydrothermal Synthesis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, water or methanol) with the ZIF-8 framework. 62 The absorbance intensity of leaf-like ZIF materials is larger than the others by ca. 19%, indicating that ZIF-8-F3 can absorb the UV region stronger than the others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Besides, the humped absorption edge is revealed at approximately 281 nm (F1), 282 nm (F2), and 273 nm (F3), which is assigned to the interactions of solvent molecules (i.e., water or methanol) with the ZIF-8 framework. 62 The absorbance intensity of leaf-like ZIF materials is larger than the others by ca. 19%, indicating that ZIF-8-F3 can absorb the UV region stronger than the others.…”
Section: Optical and Photoelectrochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The UV‐vis DR spectra could be divided into three regions: <300 nm, 300–400 nm and >400 nm, corresponding to mononuclear Fe species, oligomeric Fe x O y clusters and Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles, respectively [20] . ZIF‐8 only shows one peak located at 210 nm, which can be ascribed to the four‐coordinated Zn nodes [21] . After the in‐situ introduction of Fe species, both Fe‐ZIF‐8‐0.14 and Fe‐ZIF‐8‐0.28 samples mainly display two features located at 240 nm and 365 nm, respectively, indicating the dominance of mononuclear Fe species and oligomeric Fe x O y clusters in the two catalysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[20] ZIF-8 only shows one peak located at 210 nm, which can be ascribed to the four-coordinated Zn nodes. [21] After the in-situ introduction of Fe species, both Fe-ZIF-8-0.14 and Fe-ZIF-8-0.28 samples mainly display two features located at 240 nm and 365 nm, respectively, indicating the dominance of mononuclear Fe species and oligomeric Fe x O y clusters in the two catalysts. As the Fe loading increases for Fe-ZIF-8-0.55, the signals at 365 nm are further developed, and a broad peak at > 400 nm additionally appears, indicating the formation of more oligomeric Fe x O y clusters and also a small amount of Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles, in line with the STEM images (Figure S2) and XPS spectra of Fe-ZIF-8-0.55 (Figure 3).…”
Section: Chemcatchemmentioning
confidence: 94%