Objective
To determine the clinical impact of the second examination when both CT and TVUS are obtained in the same ED visit for acute pelvic/lower abdominal symptoms in non-pregnant premenopausal women.
Methods
200 consecutive non-pregnant premenopausal women (mean age, 31.8 years; range, 18–49 years) who underwent both ED-based TVUS and abdominopelvic CT evaluation for acute symptoms over a 12 month period were included; 107 women had TVUS first, followed by CT; 93 women had CT first. All relevant clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings were reviewed to establish a final diagnosis. Any additional clinical impact provided by the second imaging test was assessed by two experienced abdominal radiologists.
Results
Initial TVUS was interpreted as normal (
n
= 63) or mentioned incidental findings (
n
= 11) in 69% (74/107); subsequent CT established a non-gynecologic GI/GU etiology in 25 (34%). For 37% (34/93) of CT exams interpreted as normal, TVUS added no new information. In 32 cases (34%), TVUS further excluded ovarian torsion/adnexal pathology when initial CT was indeterminate/equivocal. Overall, CT following TVUS provided a key new or alternative diagnosis in 26% (28/107), whereas TVUS after CT provided a relevant new/alternative diagnosis in only 1/93 cases (
p
< 0.001). In nine cases (8%), CT confirmed a positive US diagnosis but detected relevant additional diagnostic information.
Conclusion
CT following negative TVUS frequently identified a non-gynecologic cause of acute pelvic or lower abdominal symptoms in non-pregnant premenopausal women, whereas the main benefit of TVUS after CT was more confident exclusion of ovarian torsion.
Graphical abstract
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-022-03504-6.