2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3tc30826j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of oxadiazole moiety in different D–A polyazothines and related resistive switching properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the onset absorption of AgCl/BiYO 3 composite was blue shifted with the increasing of AgCl contents. The optical bandgap energy (E g ) can be determined by using the Kubelka-Munk relation as shown in (1) (Pan et al 2013;Yan et al 2013);…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the onset absorption of AgCl/BiYO 3 composite was blue shifted with the increasing of AgCl contents. The optical bandgap energy (E g ) can be determined by using the Kubelka-Munk relation as shown in (1) (Pan et al 2013;Yan et al 2013);…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S6 †) we measured the optical bandgap (E g ) as E g ¼ 2.2 eV and thus we estimated the HOMO energy level as E HOMO ¼ E LUMO À E g , nding the eqn (1) E HOMO ¼ À6.4 AE 0.2 eV. [49][50][51] To our knowledge, this is the rst time that HOMO and LUMO energy levels of cyclic porphyrins-based copolyformal are measured by CV.…”
Section: Nickel Free-graphene Foam/porph Rings (Ni Free-g/porph Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HOMO, LUMO and bandgap energies (E g ) were calculated using formal empirical formula (HOMO = À([EA onset ] ox + 4.8) eV, LUMO = À([EA onset ] red + 4.8) eV and E g = LUMO-HOMO) [41,42]. The oxidation onsets of I, II and III were estimated to be 0.65, 0.83 and 0.56 V, which correspond to HOMO energy levels of À5.45, À5.63 and À5.36 eV, respectively [41][42][43][44][45]. The reduction potential onsets of I, II and III are À0.51, À0.63 and À0.62 V, corresponds to LUMO energy levels of À4.29, À4.17 and À4.18 eV, respectively, the energy gap (E g ) of materials I, II and III were found to be 1.2, 1.46 and 1.18 eV.…”
Section: Cyclic Voltammetry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%