1994
DOI: 10.2514/3.26514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rocket-powered single-stage vehicle configuration selection and design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ref. [30], it is considered that the mass of the reentry vehicle is m = 104, 035 kg, and the aerodynamic reference area is S = 391.22 m 2 . In this paper, the fight mission of the vehicle is to plan an optimal trajectory with the minimum flight time under various constraints.…”
Section: Numerical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ref. [30], it is considered that the mass of the reentry vehicle is m = 104, 035 kg, and the aerodynamic reference area is S = 391.22 m 2 . In this paper, the fight mission of the vehicle is to plan an optimal trajectory with the minimum flight time under various constraints.…”
Section: Numerical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rocket powered vehicle advocates claim lower dry (empty) weights, high engine thrust-toweight ratios, fewer propulsion/airframe complexities, and reduced technology requirements. Several rocket SSTO vehicles are candidates including winged vehicles powered by either SSME-derivative engines [3] or dual-fuel concepts based on derivatives of the Russian RD-701 engine [4]. Non-winged concepts such as the Delta Clipper [5,6] are also being examined.…”
Section: Acc Advanced Carbon-carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the predicted maximum S/N will be at a point represented by a combination of either the low or high bound on each design variable. Since there are only three design variables and eight (2 3 ) possible combinations, we should expect that one of the rows of the L 8 experimental array will correspond to the predicted maximum S/N. By using Taguchi's orthogonal (i.e.…”
Section: Robust Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical difficulty of designing entry vehicles originates from the large degree of coupling between the various disciplines involved in the design [1][2][3]. The disciplines which can be accounted for and integrated during the design are: trajectory optimization [4][5][6], guidance, navigation, and control (GN&C) technology [7,8], aerodynamics and aerothermodynamics [9][10][11], thermal-structural analysis [12][13][14], and thermal protection system (TPS) development [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%