2016
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggw485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust time-domain full waveform inversion with normalized zero-lag cross-correlation objective function

Abstract: S U M M A R Y In full waveform inversion (FWI) with the least-squares (L2) norm, the direct amplitude matching is never perfect and the accurate estimation of the seismic source strength is not always available. In contrast, the normalized zero-lag cross-correlation objective function relaxes on the amplitude constraints and emphasizes the phase information when measuring the closeness between the simulated and observed data. This FWI method becomes insensitive to differences in amplitude. Based on this proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dutta et al (2014) and Zhang et al (2015) demonstrate that the global correlation norm generates more stable and practical results in the least-squares migration on account of relaxing the dependence on amplitude matching often required by the L2-norm. Liu et al (2017) also indicate that FWI using the normalized crosscorrelation function is slightly less sensitive to the noise and the source signature. In this paper, we use the global correlation norm as an alternative to the least-squares misfit to mitigate the dependence on exact amplitude information of the nonlinearly smoothed wavefield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Dutta et al (2014) and Zhang et al (2015) demonstrate that the global correlation norm generates more stable and practical results in the least-squares migration on account of relaxing the dependence on amplitude matching often required by the L2-norm. Liu et al (2017) also indicate that FWI using the normalized crosscorrelation function is slightly less sensitive to the noise and the source signature. In this paper, we use the global correlation norm as an alternative to the least-squares misfit to mitigate the dependence on exact amplitude information of the nonlinearly smoothed wavefield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, when the amplitudes are low, due to attenuation in the tissue, matching the amplitudes directly is challenging. In this case, a cross‐correlation object function that measures the similarities between predicted and observed data or a phase‐only objective function that emphasizes the phase mismatch may be more efficient . Using the optimal objective function requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a cross-correlation object function that measures the similarities between predicted and observed data or a phase-only objective function that emphasizes the phase mismatch may be more efficient. 33 Using the optimal objective function requires further investigation. Note that, for this example we assume an advanced acoustic data acquisition technology that uses a custom-built sensor array, capable of acquiring planar acoustic data on a patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these misfit functions, we also consider the normalized zero-lag cross-correlation coefficient (NZCC), which best reflects both the phase match and the complex similarity of waveform shape, e.g., triplicated waveforms but regardless of the absolute amplitude. It has been used as an objective function for full waveform inversion which robustly recovers seismic structures with strong wave speed contrasts (Liu et al 2016;Tao et al 2017Tao et al , 2018. The NZCC is defined as:…”
Section: Misfit Measurements Between Data and Synthetic Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 99%