2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust stability analysis of H∞-SGQKF and its application to transfer alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the slave and master SINS are always positioned at distance from each other, and there will be relative motion between them while the vehicle turns or manoeuvres, this will introduce additional errors into the TA. The TA method based on inertial measurement matching have received extensive attention in recent years 18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] , which can be depicted in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Transfer Alignment Of Sinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the slave and master SINS are always positioned at distance from each other, and there will be relative motion between them while the vehicle turns or manoeuvres, this will introduce additional errors into the TA. The TA method based on inertial measurement matching have received extensive attention in recent years 18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] , which can be depicted in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Transfer Alignment Of Sinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the filter can be designed to achieve the desired accuracy by iterating to arrive at a suboptimal solution [23,24]. It can be easily shown that REKF reverts to EKF with → ∞.…”
Section: Rekf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the system above, we consider a generalised SGQ non-linear recursive formulation, as follows (Jia et al, 2012; Jia and Xin, 2013; Chen et al, 2014; 2015; Heiss and Winschel, 2008). where , and are the predictions of the state, a posteriori estimation of the state, and the measurement, respectively.…”
Section: The Non-linear R-sgqfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal H ∞ filter is more robust against model uncertainty; trials to minimise the influence of the worst possible disturbances on the estimation errors have been reported (Grimble and Ahmed, 1990). H ∞ solutions for the non-linear filtering problem have been proposed using three different strategies, which derive filtering algorithms according to various objectives (Piché et al, 2012; Xiong et al, 2011), described as norm-bounded uncertainties (Ishihara et al, 2006), external disturbances (Jia and Xin, 2013; Li and Jia, 2010; Chen et al, 2015; Xiong et al, 2008; Xie et al, 1994), and multiplicative noise (Piché et al, 2012; Xiong et al, 2011). Although the filter algorithms were devised for non-linear systems, they adopt linear filtering strategies for non-linear systems with the linearized approximations of non-linear functions, such as the extended H ∞ filter (Ishihara et al, 2006; Huang et al, 2012; Reif and Unbehauen, 1999; Souto et al, 2009; Seo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%