2006
DOI: 10.1002/acs.944
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Robust multiple model adaptive control (RMMAC): a case study

Abstract: We evaluate the performance of the robust multiple model adaptive control (RMMAC) methodology by considering a mass-spring-dashpot (MSD) system subject to high-frequency disturbances that strongly excite all its lightly damped oscillatory modes. The results demonstrate the superior performance of the RMMAC and its variant RMMAC/XI architecture for a much more difficult adaptive control problem than that designed and analysed in Reference (Int. J. Adaptive Control Signal Processing, in press).

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
80
10
1
0

Citation Types

0
37
0
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
48
31
10

Relationship

2
87

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 89 publications

(37 citation statements)
references

References 5 publications

0
37
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It is not difficult to see that algorithms (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), and (18) together with (A.8) guarantee with probability one that…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the weighting algorithm (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), and (18). Suppose there is a model, say M j ∈ M, which is closest to the true plant in the following sense with probability one where d is an unknown limited time instant.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose there is a model, say M j ∈ M, which is closest to the true plant in the following sense with probability one where d is an unknown limited time instant. Then, the weighting algorithm (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), and (18) guarantees…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It is not difficult to see that algorithms (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), and (18) together with (A.8) guarantee with probability one that…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the weighting algorithm (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), and (18). Suppose there is a model, say M j ∈ M, which is closest to the true plant in the following sense with probability one where d is an unknown limited time instant.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose there is a model, say M j ∈ M, which is closest to the true plant in the following sense with probability one where d is an unknown limited time instant. Then, the weighting algorithm (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), and (18) guarantees…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this methodology, the selection of the dynamic weights is key to ensure proper disturbance rejection at the desired frequencies, as well as to avoid high-frequency command signals to be sent to the control inputs. Thus, the approach adopted in this paper is fully described in [61], and consists in optimizing a given performance criterion. In this particular case, the design diagram used is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Robust Controller Design
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…One separate controller is designed, a priori, based on each model from the model bank. At each simulation phase, the actual response is compared with the response of the linearized models which are driven by the same control input [87]. The differences in the response of each model concerning the actual system response are used to generate individual model residuals.…”
Section: Multiple Model Adaptive Control (Mmac) Strategies
mentioning
confidence: 99%