2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust MPC via min–max differential inequalities

Abstract: This paper is concerned with tube-based model predictive control (MPC) for both linear and nonlinear, input-affine continuoustime dynamic systems that are affected by time-varying disturbances. We derive a min-max differential inequality describing the support function of positive robust forward invariant tubes, which can be used to construct a variety of tube-based model predictive controllers. These constructions are conservative, but computationally tractable and their complexity scales linearly with the le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [21], the tube is parametrized with online optimized matrices P t ∈ R n×n , i.e., X t = {x| x t − x 2 Pt ≤ 1}, where (6c) is ensured using min-max differential inequalities.…”
Section: Setup and General Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], the tube is parametrized with online optimized matrices P t ∈ R n×n , i.e., X t = {x| x t − x 2 Pt ≤ 1}, where (6c) is ensured using min-max differential inequalities.…”
Section: Setup and General Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Vincent Berenz is with the Autonomous Motion Department at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (vberenz@tuebingen.mpg.de). 4 Sebastian Trimpe is with the Intelligent Control Systems Group, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany (trimpe@is.mpg.de).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past two decades, there have been many suggestions on how to increase the robustness of nominal model predictive control schemes by taking external disturbance models into account [20]. An in-depth review of the numerous approaches, for example, based on min-max robust dynamic programming [3], scenario-tree MPC [28], [5], semidefinite programming reformulations [15], uncertainty-affine feedback parameterizations [8], as well as modern Tube MPC formulations [22], [29] would certainly go beyond the scope of this paper. However, we refer to [22] and [12] for review articles of existing robust MPC approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%