2007 10th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management 2007
DOI: 10.1109/inm.2007.374787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Monitoring of Network-wide Aggregates through Gossiping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second work [17] proposes a comparison between GAP (Generic Aggregation Protocol), a basic tree-based aggregation protocol and G-GAP (Gossipbased GAP), a gossip-based protocol for continuous monitoring of aggregates. Surprisingly, in opposition to the first study, this evaluation shows that, for comparative overhead, the tree-based scheme GAP outperforms the gossip protocol G-GAP both in terms of accuracy and robustness even under a dynamic network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second work [17] proposes a comparison between GAP (Generic Aggregation Protocol), a basic tree-based aggregation protocol and G-GAP (Gossipbased GAP), a gossip-based protocol for continuous monitoring of aggregates. Surprisingly, in opposition to the first study, this evaluation shows that, for comparative overhead, the tree-based scheme GAP outperforms the gossip protocol G-GAP both in terms of accuracy and robustness even under a dynamic network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we know that in a static network with no link errors, algorithms employing specialized routes such as tree-based algorithms will perform better than gossip algorithms in terms of communication overhead. In [28], Wuhib et al compare gossip algorithms with tree-based aggregation schemes for monitoring of wireline networks. They focus on models of "crash failures" where one node may crash and completely leave the network, and they find that tree-based schemes are more efficient than gossip algorithms in this context.…”
Section: Real Sensor Network Data and General Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23]- [25] the authors utilize gossip algorithms to obtain an estimate of the value distribution at any node in the network. These works follow a very different approach to monitoring than to our solution does, for which, until now, the support of accuracy objectives has not been shown.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%