2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2015.416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Model-Based 3D Head Pose Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. According to [24], we can classify existing computer vision based head pose estimation methods into two categories: learning based methods [1][2][3] [16] [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] that need large amount of training data and computational resources and geometry based methods [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] [ [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] that are fast but with a little lower accuracy, see section II for details. In this paper, as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. According to [24], we can classify existing computer vision based head pose estimation methods into two categories: learning based methods [1][2][3] [16] [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] that need large amount of training data and computational resources and geometry based methods [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] [ [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] that are fast but with a little lower accuracy, see section II for details. In this paper, as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifier-based methods can achieve good accuracy on high and low quality depth data [4,5], but they usually require extensive training with large datasets, which also cannot generalize well to different 3D sensor. 3D head model methods are more robust to other methods [7], but they require offline initialization from the user to construct personspecific reference models.…”
Section: Depth-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This registration was treated as an optimization problem that was solved through Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). One more approache based on PSO was presented by Meyer et al [9]. They performed pose estimation by registering a morphable face model to the measured depth data, using a combination of particle swarm optimization (PSO) and the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While that classification included both 2D and 3D methods, in this paper we focus on head estimation based exclusively on depth information. This considerably reduces the number of categories to: geometric methods [3], [4], appearance methods [5], [6], [7], regression methods [8], flexible models [9], [10] and tracking methods [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%