2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.4.103907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust flow reconstruction from limited measurements via sparse representation

Abstract: In many applications it is important to estimate a fluid flow field from limited and possibly corrupt measurements. Current methods in flow estimation often use least squares regression to reconstruct the flow field, finding the minimum-energy solution that is consistent with the measured data. However, this approach may be prone to overfitting and sensitive to noise. To address these challenges we instead seek a sparse representation of the data in a library of examples. Sparse representation has been widely … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This scheme has already been tested in twodimensional barotropic flows [21] and weather models [22], showing better results than linear DA schemes, but still presenting nontrivial obstacles when scaling to highdimensional systems. New techniques based on machine learning have been applied to the flow reconstruction problem as well [23,24], but only on two-dimensional flows. One important point to make about the aforementioned techniques is that they can be hard and/or very expensive to scale to three-dimensional flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme has already been tested in twodimensional barotropic flows [21] and weather models [22], showing better results than linear DA schemes, but still presenting nontrivial obstacles when scaling to highdimensional systems. New techniques based on machine learning have been applied to the flow reconstruction problem as well [23,24], but only on two-dimensional flows. One important point to make about the aforementioned techniques is that they can be hard and/or very expensive to scale to three-dimensional flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first method used is the most common implementation of sparse recovery originating from the compressed sensing literature (Donoho, 2006;Candès and Wakin, 2008;Callaham et al, 2019). This method allows to calculate a set of coefficients that approximate the real coefficients by taking advantage of the fact that many entries of the global basis are negligibly small (c.f.…”
Section: Methods 1: Sparse Recovery Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse reconstruction is a technique used to obtain accurate details about the full scale features of a system using a sparse subset of information (e.g., a few pixels or measurements within the system) and has been the subject of interest for some decades (Candès, 2006;Donoho, 2006). Applications for such state estimation problems range from reconstructing faces from limited or corrupted data (Wright et al, 2008) to deblurring and improving image resolution (Dong et al, 2011) to estimating global sea surface temperatures (Manohar et al, 2018;Callaham et al, 2019). The literature concerning state estimation and sparse reconstruction is rapidly developing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our final number of snapshots for training amounts to 427, and for testing amounts to 1487. This train–test split of the dataset is a common configuration for data-driven studies [40] and the 8 year training period captures several short- and long-term trends in the global sea-surface temperature. Individual training samples are constructed by selecting a window of inputs (from the past) and a corresponding window of outputs (for the forecast task in the future) from the set of 427 training snapshots.…”
Section: Dataset(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%