2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64689-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Features for Snapshot Hyperspectral Terrain-Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem they solve is the difficulty of labeling training data for AI algorithms. Similarly, references [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ] are about environmental classification, not navigation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem they solve is the difficulty of labeling training data for AI algorithms. Similarly, references [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ] are about environmental classification, not navigation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c and 1d are manufactured by IMEC [7]. They are embedded in a few off-the-shelf MSFA-based devices available on the market, like XIMEA xiSpec and IMEC "snapshot mosaic" multispectral cameras, with applications in medical imaging [8] or terrain classification [9]. The 4 × 4 basic pattern samples 16 bands centered at wavelengths λ 1 = 469 nm, .…”
Section: A Multispectral Filter Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the difficulty of data acquisition for Mars terrain images, many studies tested terrain classification methods with roves’ fully operational duplicates in Earth conditions and then applied those methods to the actual rover. The image features that are often used for terrain classification in those studies include color features based on the RGB space [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], HSV [ 6 , 7 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], and Lab [ 16 ] spaces; Gabor features [ 12 , 17 , 18 ]; the contrast [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], correlation [ 12 ], energy [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], and consistency [ 12 ] of gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM); SURF features [ 19 , 20 ]; Daisy features [ 19 , 20 ]; local binary patterns (LBP) [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]; local ternary patterns (LTP) [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]; local adaptive ternary patterns (LATP) [ 19 , 20 ]; contrast context histogram (CCH) [ 20 ]; and the mean [ 2 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 22 ], entropy [ 8 , 9 , 22 ], contrast [ 8 , 23 ], correlation [ 23 ], energy [ 8 ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will reduce the classification accuracy for terrain classification. In these studies, the classifiers used include random forests (RFs) [ 2 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], SVMs [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 ], multilayer perceptron [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 19 , 20 ], LIBLINEAR [ 19 , 20 ], decision tree [ 19 , 20 ], naïve Bayes classifier [ 19 , 20 ], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20 ], extreme learning machine [ 17 , 24 ], batch-incremental regression tree model [ 22 ], probabilistic neural network [ 23 ], and multilayer feed forward neural network learning algorithm [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%