2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-016-3625-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and Secure Multiple Watermarking for Medical Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum NC value obtained at scaling factor= 0.2 is 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Gaussian noise compared to 0.9908obtained by [2], 0.9466 obtained by [3] and 0.944001 obtained by [10] respectively, 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Salt & pepper compared to 0.9953obtained by [2], 0.9658obtained by [3] and 0.949754obtained by [10] respectively, 1 for watermark images 'Doctor image' and 'Fingerprint' against Speckle noise (density = 0.00001)compared to 0.949742obtained by [10], 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Median filtering compared to 0.9861 obtained by [2], 0.0123 obtained by [3] and 0.9985 obtained by [10] respectively, 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Salt & Peppers (d = 0.002) + Speckle (V=0.005) compared to 0.8328 obtained by [3], and finally 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Gaussian (M=0.01,V=0.002)+ Speckle (V=0.005)compared to 0.8276 obtained by [3].…”
Section: T R a N S A C T I O N S O N M A C H I N E L E A R N I N G A mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum NC value obtained at scaling factor= 0.2 is 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Gaussian noise compared to 0.9908obtained by [2], 0.9466 obtained by [3] and 0.944001 obtained by [10] respectively, 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Salt & pepper compared to 0.9953obtained by [2], 0.9658obtained by [3] and 0.949754obtained by [10] respectively, 1 for watermark images 'Doctor image' and 'Fingerprint' against Speckle noise (density = 0.00001)compared to 0.949742obtained by [10], 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Median filtering compared to 0.9861 obtained by [2], 0.0123 obtained by [3] and 0.9985 obtained by [10] respectively, 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Salt & Peppers (d = 0.002) + Speckle (V=0.005) compared to 0.8328 obtained by [3], and finally 1 for watermark image 'Doctor image' against Gaussian (M=0.01,V=0.002)+ Speckle (V=0.005)compared to 0.8276 obtained by [3].…”
Section: T R a N S A C T I O N S O N M A C H I N E L E A R N I N G A mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, the minimum NC value is 0.9571 against Speckle noise for watermark image 'Fingerprint'. In Table 5, we have compared the robustness of our technique against various attacks compared to existing techniques [2], [3] and [10].…”
Section: T R a N S A C T I O N S O N M A C H I N E L E A R N I N G A mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durante los últimos años se han implementado técnicas basadas en marcas de agua, las cuales son aplicadas a imágenes médicas [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. En la presente sección se presentan los métodos más representativos los cuales aplican técnicas de marcado de agua en imágenes médicas.…”
Section: Estado Del Arteunclassified
“…Sharma [9] propone marca de agua múltiple combinando las transformadas DWT y la Transformada Discreta del Coseno (DCT por sus siglas en inglés de Discrete Cosine Transform), además de los algoritmos de cifrado RSA (Rivest, Shamir y Adleman) y MD5 (Message-Digest Algorithm 5), y el ECC Hamming, en este proceso utiliza dos marcas de agua, una imagen (logo del centro hospitalario) y otra marca de agua como texto (EPR) los cuales son cifrados por el algoritmo RSA.…”
Section: Estado Del Arteunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation