2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1347297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pediatric Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review of Feasibility and Current Status

Abstract: For the diverse and highly selective cases in this review, robot-assisted MIS seems safe and feasible. Current status is low volume, in a relatively static state of adoption, and without any apparent index pathology or procedure. The benefits of robot assistance seem well suited but remain unsubstantiated by evidence. Higher quality studies are needed to determine true safety and efficacy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are benefits and limitations of using robotic surgery for children with cancer (74), it is feasible for the surgical treatment of tumors in pediatric patients and only isolated adverse events have been reported for malignant tumors, such as tumor spillage and residual disease (45). The current status of robotic surgery for tumors in children is low volume usage, in a relatively static global state of adoption and when applied the oncological surgical principles must be respected (46, 47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are benefits and limitations of using robotic surgery for children with cancer (74), it is feasible for the surgical treatment of tumors in pediatric patients and only isolated adverse events have been reported for malignant tumors, such as tumor spillage and residual disease (45). The current status of robotic surgery for tumors in children is low volume usage, in a relatively static global state of adoption and when applied the oncological surgical principles must be respected (46, 47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there has been an increasing availability of smaller instruments and equipment more suitable to the pediatric patient, for conventional laparo-thoracoscopy, there has been an increase in the use of these techniques with children. With robotic assistance there are also risks, among others, are port-site metastases and peritoneal spread, after resection due to minimal invasion of neoplasms (44, 45). The current status of robotic surgery for tumors in children is low volume usage, and globally a relatively static adoption (4648).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimal invasive surgery is strongly discouraged when malignancy is suspected (Level III; Grade E). Therefore, minimally invasive techniques in the surgical management of ACT are not recommended, even when they are feasible, 30–34 and could only be considered in early childhood, but their use should be limited to (a) small‐volume localised tumours likely to be benign without invasion of surrounding structures and nodal involvement at preoperative imaging; and (b) tertiary care centres and surgeons experienced in oncologic and adrenal surgery (Level IV; Grade D). In particular, tumours with a volume exceeding 200 cm 3 and/or suspicious regional nodal involvement and/or signs of local invasion should always be resected using an open laparotomy, with no exceptions (Level IV; Grade B).…”
Section: Therapeutic Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pediatric cancer surgery is an area of opportunity for robotic surgery. Its technical challenges create the opportunity to develop robotic approaches that meet the challenges of complex cancer procedures [151].…”
Section: Oncologic Robotic Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%