2017
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1709118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease

Abstract: Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events. (Funded by Bayer; COMPASS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776424 .).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
1,244
1
170

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,798 publications
(1,437 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
20
1,244
1
170
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also consistent with the results of the overall trial, which have been reported separately. 18 Collectively, these results show that in patients with arterial vascular disease, low dose anticoagulants and aspirin have an additive effect. The subgroup of patients with peripheral artery disease but no coronary artery disease was too small to show significance on its own, but the results were directionally consistent with the rest of the patients in the analysis, and the test for heterogeneity was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are also consistent with the results of the overall trial, which have been reported separately. 18 Collectively, these results show that in patients with arterial vascular disease, low dose anticoagulants and aspirin have an additive effect. The subgroup of patients with peripheral artery disease but no coronary artery disease was too small to show significance on its own, but the results were directionally consistent with the rest of the patients in the analysis, and the test for heterogeneity was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Details are provided elsewhere. 17,18 This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01776424, and is closed to new participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SMART‐REACH model, incorporated in an online calculator (eg, Supplemental Calculator and http://www.U-Prevent.com), may support clinical decision making on (novel) therapeutic options by estimating an individual's anticipated treatment benefit in terms of life expectancy without recurrent cardiovascular events. This may particularly be of value for novel effective but costly agents such as PCSK9 inhibitors, potent antithrombotics, and anti‐inflammatory agents 23, 35, 36, 37. Ideally, such treatment effect estimations are validated on the basis of the original trial data of such novel therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous to other trials, a combined end point of MACE and MALE was examined. 14,18 Prespecified safety end points as defined in the primary analysis were included for the PAD subgroup.…”
Section: What Are the Clinical Implications?mentioning
confidence: 99%