2008
DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.13.1503
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Risks and Benefits of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Remain Unclear

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
19
6
5
0

Citation Types

0
17
0
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
28
1
1

Relationship

0
30

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 30 publications

(17 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
17
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to concerns raised in the scientific literature 9,12,29 and by organizations such as the American Society of Human Genetics, 30 the American College of Medicine Genetics, 31 and the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society, 32 we found no significant differences in levels of worry for 10 of the 12 conditions tested comparing patients who received predictive genomic risk information with those who received usual care; differences merely approached statistical significance for the remaining 2 conditions (prostate cancer and osteoarthritis). These findings are not unlike those recently reported by Bloss et al, 33 who found that genome-wide testing in a nonclinical setting had no measurable impact on psychological health or behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…In contrast to concerns raised in the scientific literature 9,12,29 and by organizations such as the American Society of Human Genetics, 30 the American College of Medicine Genetics, 31 and the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society, 32 we found no significant differences in levels of worry for 10 of the 12 conditions tested comparing patients who received predictive genomic risk information with those who received usual care; differences merely approached statistical significance for the remaining 2 conditions (prostate cancer and osteoarthritis). These findings are not unlike those recently reported by Bloss et al, 33 who found that genome-wide testing in a nonclinical setting had no measurable impact on psychological health or behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Remote recruitment and conduct of research visits in individuals who have undergone DTC genetic testing is feasible, shows relatively good agreement with self-reported data, and is well received by participants. While the benefits of DTC genetic testing continue to be debated, 1 , 2 , 11 , 31 – 39 this proof of concept study demonstrates its potential to identify, follow, and engage geographically dispersed populations with a given disorder and an underlying genotype in research. 40 Our 32% response rate to a single recruitment email suggests that targeted electronic recruitment in populations unrestricted by geography may improve participation in research studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Moreover, the desire to reduce health-related uncertainty can be a potentially motivating factor in this setting. Thus, WGS providers must promote awareness that screening results may find a very small increased risk of disease with no clear course of action [31] to counteract misconceptions about the predictive power of WGS [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.