1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990315)80:6<852::aid-ijc9>3.3.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of colorectal and other gastro‐intestinal cancers after exposure to nitrate, nitrite and N‐nitroso compounds: a follow‐up study

Abstract: N-nitroso compounds are potent carcinogens detected in foodstuffs. The importance of dietary nitrosamines in relation to human cancer development is, however, uncertain. We studied the relationship between intake of nitrates, nitrites and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and risk of cancers of the gastro-intestinal tract in a cohort of 9,985 adult Finnish men and women. During a follow-up period of up to 24 years, 189 gastro-intestinal cancer cases were diagnosed in the cohort, initially free from cancer. Intake … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
113
4
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
113
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This raises the question whether information at the food level as an indicator of cured PM consumption is sufficient to describe exposure differences for nitrite/nitrate through PM consumption, because this approach assumes a similar NaNO 2 content in the ready-to-eat PM products in the different countries which might not be correct. In a Finnish study, conducted between 1966 and 1972, mean intake of nitrite was 5.3 mg day 21 , provided nearly exclusively by cured meats and PM 5,36 . However, another report from Finland calculated an average daily intake of 1.88 mg 33 .…”
Section: Table 2bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the question whether information at the food level as an indicator of cured PM consumption is sufficient to describe exposure differences for nitrite/nitrate through PM consumption, because this approach assumes a similar NaNO 2 content in the ready-to-eat PM products in the different countries which might not be correct. In a Finnish study, conducted between 1966 and 1972, mean intake of nitrite was 5.3 mg day 21 , provided nearly exclusively by cured meats and PM 5,36 . However, another report from Finland calculated an average daily intake of 1.88 mg 33 .…”
Section: Table 2bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, that conclusion was based mainly on casecontrol studies, which are more susceptible to systematic bias than prospective cohort studies, and recent prospective studies have been inconsistent. [3][4][5][6] Besides much salt and nitrites or nitrates, processed meat products like bacon, sausage and ham often contains carcinogenic nitrosamines.7-9 N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is the most frequently occurring nitrosamine in foods.10 Nitrosamines can also be formed endogenously in the stomach through nitrosation of nitrite with amines.7 To date, 5 case-control studies [11][12][13][14][15] and only 1 prospective cohort study 3 with a small number of cases (n 5 68) have investigated the association between NDMA or nitrosamine intake and stomach cancer risk, with 4 case-control studies [11][12][13]15 showing a positive association.To examine whether associations exist between intake of processed meat and NDMA and risk of stomach cancer, we used prospective data from the Swedish Mammography Cohort, a large population-based cohort with 18 years of follow-up and repeated assessments of diet. In addition, we evaluated risk of stomach cancer in relation to consumption of red meat, poultry and fish.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies indicate adverse effects to food additives, in both acute and chronic forms, such as toxic reactions in metabolism, triggering allerg ies [4][5], carcinogenicity in animals [6], p robable carcinogenicity in hu mans [7][8] and behavioural changes [9][10]. Regarding such effects, those that are linked to children health stand out, because children are among the biggest consumers of p rocessed products and, thus, have more susceptibility to these adverse effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%